Smarter Decisions,
Better Care

UpToDate synthesizes the most recent medical information into evidence-based practical recommendations clinicians trust to make the right point-of-care decisions.

  • Rigorous editorial process: Evidence-based treatment recommendations
  • World-Renowned physician authors: over 5,100 physician authors and editors around the globe
  • Innovative technology: integrates into the workflow; access from EMRs

Choose from the list below to learn more about subscriptions for a:

Subscribers log in here



Culdocentesis is a procedure performed in women in which peritoneal fluid is aspirated from the posterior pelvic cul-de-sac (pouch of Douglas) through the posterior vaginal fornix. There are few indications for this procedure in current practice. Historically, it was used to evaluate women for hematoperitoneum or a pelvic infection. However, this role has largely been replaced by evaluation with pelvic imaging, image-guided aspiration of fluid, and minimally invasive surgery.

The culdocentesis procedure is reviewed here. Other approaches to the evaluation of women with suspected pelvic bleeding or infection are discussed separately. (See "Evaluation and management of ruptured ovarian cyst" and "Clinical features and diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease" and "Ectopic pregnancy: Clinical manifestations and diagnosis".)


Culdocentesis may be used to evaluate women with pain in the lower abdomen/pelvis to determine whether intraabdominal fluid is present and, if present, to reveal the nature of the fluid (eg, serous, purulent, bloody). Thus, the procedure can be helpful in evaluating women with a suspected ruptured ovarian cyst, pelvic inflammatory disease, or ruptured ectopic pregnancy [1-4]. (See "Evaluation and management of ruptured ovarian cyst" and "Clinical features and diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease" and "Ectopic pregnancy: Clinical manifestations and diagnosis".)

Ultrasound examination has largely replaced culdocentesis because it accurately identifies the presence of abdominal/pelvic fluid, is more comfortable for the patient, and provides additional information about the pelvis, such as whether there is an adnexal mass or intrauterine pregnancy. Findings on ultrasonography are especially useful when interpreted in conjunction with laboratory test results, such as a complete blood count and pregnancy test. However, culdocentesis may be useful when ultrasonography is not readily available.


Prior to the procedure, a bimanual examination should be performed to ascertain that the posterior cul-de-sac does not contain cysts, masses, or other structures that might contaminate the peritoneal cavity if perforated or that could impede access to free fluid in the posterior cul-de-sac. A fixed retroverted uterus or a bleeding diathesis are additional contraindications.


Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Nov 2014. | This topic last updated: Jun 30, 2014.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2014 UpToDate, Inc.