Contributor disclosures are reviewed for conflicts of interest by the editorial group. When found, these are addressed by vetting through a multi-level review process, and through requirements for references to be provided to support the content. Appropriately referenced content is required of all authors and must conform to UpToDate standards of evidence.
INTRODUCTION — Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is one of the most common hospital-acquired (nosocomial) infections and is an increasingly frequent cause of morbidity and mortality among older adult hospitalized patients . C. difficile colonizes the human intestinal tract after the normal gut flora has been altered by antibiotic therapy and is the causative organism of antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis.
The treatment of CDI, including initial management, management of relapse, and management of severe disease, will be reviewed here [2,3]. The pathophysiology, epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis are discussed separately. (See "Clostridium difficile in adults: Epidemiology, microbiology, and pathophysiology" and "Clostridium difficile infection in adults: Clinical manifestations and diagnosis".)
GENERAL MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES — An important initial step in the treatment of C. difficile infection (CDI) is cessation of the inciting antibiotic as soon as possible. Treatment with concomitant antibiotics (ie, antibiotics other than those given to treat C. difficile infection) is associated both with significant prolongation of diarrhea and with increased risk of recurrent C. difficile infection [4,5]. If ongoing antibiotics are essential for treatment of the primary infection, it may be prudent if possible to select antibiotic therapy that is less frequently implicated in antibiotic-associated CDI, such as parenteral aminoglycosides, sulfonamides, macrolides, vancomycin, or tetracycline.
Management must also include implementation of infection control policies. Patients with suspected or proven C. difficile infection should be placed on contact precautions, and healthcare workers should wash hands before and after patient contact. Hand hygiene with soap and water may be more effective than alcohol-based hand sanitizers in removing C. difficile spores, since C. difficile spores are resistant to killing by alcohol. Therefore, use of soap and water is favored over alcohol-based hand sanitization in the setting of a CDI outbreak, although thus far no studies have demonstrated superiority of soap and water in non-outbreak settings . (See "Clostridium difficile infection: Prevention and control".)
In addition, antimotility agents such as loperamide and opiates have traditionally been avoided in CDI, but the evidence that they cause harm is equivocal [6-8]. Supportive care with attention to correction of fluid losses and electrolyte imbalances is also important. Patients may have regular diet as tolerated unless surgery or other procedure is planned.
Indications for treatment — Patients with typical manifestations of C. difficile infection (eg, diarrhea, abdominal pain, or nausea and vomiting) and a positive diagnostic assay should receive antibiotics for treatment for C. difficile infection [9,10]. Empiric therapy is appropriate pending results of diagnostic testing if the clinical suspicion is high . Treatment of C. difficile infection is not indicated in patients who have a positive toxin assay but are asymptomatic. (See "Clostridium difficile infection in adults: Clinical manifestations and diagnosis".)
Assessing severity — Patients with acute C. difficile infection (CDI) may develop signs of systemic toxicity with or without profuse diarrhea warranting admission to an intensive care unit or emergency surgery. There is no consensus definition for severe CDI nor is there agreement as to the most important clinical indicators that should be used to differentiate severity [11-13]. The following illustrate some definitions that have been described in the literature:
●Guideline parameters for severe CDI include white blood cell count of >15,000 cells/microL, serum albumin <3 g/dL, and/or a serum creatinine level ≥1.5 times the premorbid level [1,8,14].
●As part of a randomized trial comparing metronidazole with vancomycin, a scoring system was devised to identify patients with severe infection . One point each was given for age >60 years, temperature >38.3ºC, serum albumin <2.5 g/dL (25 g/L), or peripheral white blood cell count >15,000 cells/microL within 48 hours of enrollment. Two points were given for endoscopic evidence of pseudomembranous colitis or treatment in the intensive care unit. Patients with two or more points were considered to have severe disease.
For the purposes of the treatment decisions in the following discussion, determination of disease severity is left to clinician judgment and may include any or all of the criteria mentioned above.
Data on the incidence of severe CDI are limited, especially given the lack of a consensus definition. The risk of complications during first CDI recurrence in the Québec outbreak caused by the hypervirulent North American pulsed field type 1 (NAP1) strain was 11 percent . Complications included shock, need for colectomy, megacolon, perforation, or death within 30 days. Older age, high leukocyte count, and acute renal failure were strongly associated with a complicated course. (See "Clostridium difficile in adults: Epidemiology, microbiology, and pathophysiology".)
Mild or moderate disease — Options for treatment of nonsevere CDI include oral metronidazole, oral vancomycin, and oral fidaxomicin (table 1) [1,14,16]. Several trials have demonstrated equivalent efficacy of metronidazole and vancomycin for the treatment of nonsevere CDI [11,17,18]. In one randomized trial including 81 patients with mild or moderately severe CDI, metronidazole and vancomycin produced similar rates of clinical cure (90 versus 98 percent) .
Use of metronidazole has been favored over vancomycin to limit the spread of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE); however, subsequent data have suggested that the risk of bowel VRE colonization with these drugs is equivalent [19,20].
Observational study of CDI in Canada from 1991 to 2003 preliminarily suggested that patients treated with metronidazole for an initial episode of CDI may be at increased risk for relapse [12,21]. However, review of the data through 2006 demonstrated a similar trend in the frequency of recurrences for both metronidazole and vancomycin, suggesting that the rise in recurrence rate during 2003 to 2004 for patients treated with either drug may have corresponded to reinfection during a period when in-hospital exposure to C. difficile spores was very high [22,23].
Limitations of metronidazole include dose-dependent peripheral neuropathy and side effects of nausea and metallic taste. Although the above studies are limited because of their observational methodologies, the findings raise the possibility that metronidazole may be less effective than oral vancomycin .
The treatment of severe disease is discussed below. (See 'Severe disease' below.)
Antibiotic therapy — Antibiotics for treatment of mild or moderate CDI (initial episode) include metronidazole and oral vancomycin. Dosing is as follows: metronidazole 500 mg orally three times daily or 250 mg four times daily for 10 to 14 days and vancomycin 125 mg orally four times daily. Oral vancomycin is not absorbed systemically and achieves predictably high levels in the colon. Dosing regimens of 125 mg four times daily and 500 mg four times daily are equally effective for the treatment of nonsevere CDI (figure 1) . Intravenous vancomycin has no effect on C. difficile colitis since the antibiotic is not excreted appreciably into the colon.
The recommended duration of initial antibiotic therapy for nonsevere C. difficile diarrhea is 10 to 14 days . Patients with an underlying infection requiring prolonged duration of antibiotics are at increased risk for recurrence . Therefore, it may be reasonable to continue CDI treatment throughout the antibiotic course plus an additional week after its completion.
Repeat stool assays are NOT warranted during or following treatment in patients who are recovering or are symptom free. Up to 50 percent of patients have positive stool assays for as long as six weeks after the completion of therapy [25,26].
The reasons for metronidazole failure are poorly understood . Stool metronidazole concentrations in patients receiving the drug orally are higher in watery stools at the beginning of CDI treatment than in semiformed stools a few days later . Thus, stool metronidazole levels decrease as colonic inflammation subsides. In contrast, oral vancomycin maintains high stool concentrations (1000 to 3000 mcg/mL throughout the course of therapy) [28,29].
Given these observations, even a modest increase in an organism's minimum inhibitory concentration for metronidazole might lead to insufficient stool levels after a few days of treatment. Although some metronidazole resistance in C. difficile has been described [30-34], resistance rates are low and do not appear to be increasing in the setting of the rising rates of treatment failure [35-38]. Prior exposure to metronidazole is not likely to influence the efficacy of metronidazole for treatment of CDI.
Severe disease — Issues relating to assessing severity are discussed above. (See 'Assessing severity' above.)
Patients with severe CDI should receive antibiotic therapy, supportive care, and close monitoring. Surgery should be considered if the patient's clinical status fails to improve and the serum lactate is above 2.2 . Toxic megacolon should be suspected if the patient develops abdominal distention with diminution of diarrhea; this may reflect paralytic ileus resulting from loss of colonic muscular tone . (See "Toxic megacolon" and 'Surgery' below.)
Antibiotic therapy — We recommend that patients with severe disease be treated with oral vancomycin (125 mg four times daily) [1,11,15,23,42-47]. For patients with severe disease who do not demonstrate clinical improvement within 24 to 48 hours or who develop complications (such as renal failure, ileus), we suggest increasing the dose of oral vancomycin to 500 mg four times daily. Fidaxomicin may be considered in patients who cannot tolerate vancomycin, although more data are needed. In the setting of ileus, addition of intravenous metronidazole (500 mg every eight hours) is appropriate. Intracolonic vancomycin may be considered in patients with profound ileus.
We are in agreement with guidelines issued after 2010 that recommend oral vancomycin as first-line therapy for severe CDI [1,8,14]. This practice reflects reports of frequent metronidazole failures in CDI and studies showing the superiority of oral vancomycin in severe disease [11,12,17,18,43,48]. The major pharmacologic advantage of vancomycin over metronidazole is that vancomycin is not absorbed, so maximal concentrations of the drug can act intracolonically at the site of infection. The drugs appear to be relatively similar with respect to in vitro activity, risk of relapse, and potential for emergence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci [19,23,44,49,50]. However, vancomycin is costlier than metronidazole.
The standard duration of antibiotic therapy for C. difficile diarrhea is 10 to 14 days; the antibiotic course should be tailored to clinical circumstances for patients with severe disease. Those with an underlying infection requiring prolonged duration of antibiotics should continue CDI treatment throughout the antibiotic course plus one additional week after its completion.
Intracolonic administration of vancomycin via enema (given in combination with intravenous metronidazole) is an option for patients who do not tolerate oral medication, but there is risk of colonic perforation. Therefore, use of intracolonic vancomycin should be restricted to patients who are unresponsive to standard therapies, and the procedure should be performed by personnel with expertise in administering enemas.
●Oral antibiotics – Oral vancomycin (125 mg four times daily) should be initiated promptly for severely ill patients. Some data suggest that levels achieved with higher dosing of vancomycin (500 mg four times daily) may be equivalent to levels with standard dosing . Nevertheless, many clinicians favor higher dosing for severe disease, although there is no supportive evidence .
For patients with severe disease who do not demonstrate clinical improvement with oral vancomycin, administration of therapy with fidaxomicin (200 mg orally twice daily) is reasonable. Additional data are needed on the efficacy of fidaxomicin in the setting of severe disease.
For circumstances in which neither vancomycin nor fidaxomicin is available, oral metronidazole (500 mg three times daily or 250 mg four times daily for 14 days) may be administered, although it is less effective than vancomycin .
●Intravenous antibiotics – Severely ill patients with ileus may have markedly delayed passage of oral antibiotics from the stomach to the colon; these individuals may benefit from the addition of intravenous metronidazole (500 mg every eight hours) . Fecal concentrations in the therapeutic range can be achieved with this regimen because of biliary and intestinal excretion of the drug [28,52,53]. However, it is uncertain whether intravenous therapy alone is as effective as oral therapy, so oral therapy should be administered whenever feasible .
Intravenous vancomycin has no effect on C. difficile colitis since vancomycin is not excreted into the colon.
Intravenous tigecycline has been used in a small number of patients with severe CDI that was refractory to standard therapy . Given the lack of data, we do not recommend tigecycline for C. difficile colitis.
●Intracolonic antibiotics – Intracolonic vancomycin (vancomycin enema) may be an effective adjunctive therapy for patients who cannot tolerate the oral preparation or for patients who have a condition preventing oral vancomycin from reaching the colon such as ileus, megacolon, Hartman's pouch, ileostomy, or colonic diversion [8,56-58]. In a case series of nine patients with refractory symptoms, toxic megacolon, or fulminant colitis, rectal vancomycin was administered in addition to standard antibiotics . Eight patients had complete resolution of symptoms, and one patient died from multisystem organ failure.
The optimal dosing of intracolonic vancomycin has not been established by clinical trials, and case descriptions vary widely; rectal vancomycin is often given as a retention enema containing 500 mg in 100 mL of normal saline every six hours [1,56,57,59-63]. One report suggests that patients with megacolon may benefit from colonoscopic decompression and placement of a tube in the right colon, which can be perfused with a 1 mg/mL solution of vancomycin in normal saline to deliver a total dose of 1 to 2 g per day ; however, this requires further confirmation. Dose adjustments may be required depending on individual circumstances, including extent of colonic disease and patient weight. It is important to note that vancomycin can be absorbed through inflamed colonic mucosa and cause toxicity if it accumulates in patients with renal failure. (See "Vancomycin: Parenteral dosing and serum concentration monitoring in adults".)
Surgery — Some severely ill patients with CDI require surgical intervention as a result of toxic megacolon, perforation or impending perforation, necrotizing colitis, or rapidly progressive and/or refractory disease with systemic inflammatory response syndrome leading to multiorgan system failure [64-66]. The optimal timing of surgery is uncertain.
Literature written prior to the emergence of the hypervirulent strain suggested surgery for CDI patients with severe disease unresponsive to medical therapy within 48 hours, bowel perforation, or multiorgan system failure .
However, in the setting of CDI due to the hypervirulent strain, some patients progressed from severe disease to death in less than 48 hours. Furthermore, some patients with severe disease cannot receive enteral therapy due to ileus or severe nausea and vomiting. Data from the Canadian outbreak with the hypervirulent strain have been used to try to standardize criteria for surgical intervention. In a retrospective review, colectomy was most beneficial for immunocompetent patients aged ≥65 years with a white blood cell count ≥20,000 cells/microL and/or a plasma lactate between 2.2 and 4.9 mEq/L .
We favor early surgery for patients with the above criteria. In addition, surgical intervention is advisable in the setting of peritoneal signs, severe ileus, or toxic megacolon.
Two surgical approaches for management of CDI have been described: subtotal colectomy (removal of the entire colon with ileostomy without removal of the rectum) and diverting loop ileostomy with colonic lavage.
●Subtotal colectomy – Subtotal colectomy is the procedure for which there is greatest experience in the setting of emergency surgical intervention for CDI [40,68-70]. In a retrospective review of 14 patients who underwent surgery for severe CDI, 9 patients survived, of whom 8 had subtotal colectomy and 1 had a right hemicolectomy . Four of the five patients who died had undergone left hemicolectomy.
Primary anastomosis is not feasible acutely due to the pancolitis associated with severe disease. However, after colonic inflammation has subsided, closure of the ileostomy and ileorectal anastomosis can be created.
●Diverting loop ileostomy and colonic lavage may be a potential alternative procedure to colectomy in the treatment of severe complicated CDI. In one study including 42 patients with severe CDI, reduced mortality was observed among patients who underwent loop ileostomy and colonic lavage compared with the historical controls who underwent colectomy (19 versus 50 percent; odds ratio 0.24; p = 0.006) . The surgical approach involved creation of a loop ileostomy, intraoperative colonic lavage with warmed polyethylene glycol solution via the ileostomy, and postoperative antegrade instillation of vancomycin flushes via the ileostomy. Preservation of the colon was achieved in 93 percent of patients. This surgical approach is potentially promising, but further data from prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to validate this preliminary study.
RECURRENT DISEASE — Recurrent C. difficile infection is defined separately. (See "Clostridium difficile infection in adults: Clinical manifestations and diagnosis", section on 'Recurrent disease'.)
Initial recurrence — The signs and symptoms of recurrence are similar to those in the initial episode, usually without progression in severity . Because a positive stool toxin assay does not exclude asymptomatic carriage, other causes for diarrhea should be considered, including other infections, inflammatory bowel disease, or irritable bowel syndrome. Colonoscopy should be considered in atypical cases to evaluate for evidence of CDI and to exclude other etiologies.
For treatment of an initial episode of CDI, fidaxomicin has been associated with a lower incidence of recurrent CDI than vancomycin (15 versus 25 percent) . For treatment of initial recurrence of CDI, the initial response to therapy with fidaxomicin and vancomycin has been observed to be comparable, although the likelihood of recurrence four weeks later is lower with fidaxomicin than vancomycin (20 versus 36 percent) .
Patients with mild symptoms of recurrence who are otherwise well may be managed conservatively without further antibiotic therapy. Nonsevere initial recurrence following therapy for CDI can be treated with metronidazole. The decision to administer vancomycin as treatment for a first recurrence should be based upon the presence of markers of severe disease at the time of first recurrence rather than on previous drug exposure.
Fidaxomicin is an alternative agent for treatment of an initial recurrence of CDI (table 1). In one study including 128 patients with a first CDI recurrence, the recurrence rate was lower among patients treated with fidaxomicin than among patients treated with vancomycin (19 versus 35 percent; 95% CI -30.4 to -0.3 percent; p = 0.045) .
Subsequent recurrences — Patients with one recurrence have a substantial risk of subsequent CDI episodes after the second course of antibiotic therapy is discontinued. In one study, for example, patients with one or more previous recurrences had a subsequent recurrence rate of 65 percent following standard therapy with metronidazole or vancomycin .
There are no rigorous studies of management for multiple recurrences of CDI. Patients with multiple recurrences may benefit from vancomycin (administered in a pulse-tapered fashion), fidaxomicin, or rifaximin, with or without the use of probiotics (table 1). Vancomycin and fidaxomicin are preferred; rifaximin is an acceptable alternative regimen.
●Vancomycin – Administration of vancomycin in a pulse-tapered fashion may be effective for management of recurrent C. difficile infection (table 1). The use of intermittent antibiotic therapy is based upon a theory that relapse may be due to the presence of persistent spores that survive antibiotic therapy. Intermittent therapy may allow the spores to germinate on the days when no antibiotics are administered. Once the spores have converted to the fully functional vegetative toxin-producing forms, they are susceptible to killing when the antibiotics are readministered.
A tapered oral vancomycin regimen consists of a stepwise decrease in dose over a period of time. Intermittent (or pulsed) vancomycin therapy consists of administering the drug every few days. Prolonged antibiotic therapy, with or without tapered or intermittent dosing, may also be important for definitive treatment.
Data on intermittent and tapered vancomycin regimens are limited [26,76,77]. In one study of 163 CDI cases, for example, 29 patients were treated with a vancomycin-tapered regimen and 7 were treated with a vancomycin-pulsed regimen; recurrence rates were 31 and 14 percent, respectively, compared with a recurrence rate of 45 percent for other regimens . In another study, 12 patients with an average of four prior episodes of recurrent CDI were treated with a vancomycin-tapered regimen; the recurrence rate was 41 percent .
●Fidaxomicin – Fidaxomicin is a macrocyclic antibiotic that is bactericidal against C. difficile (in contrast with metronidazole and vancomycin, which are bacteriostatic) . It has a narrower antimicrobial spectrum than metronidazole or vancomycin, leading to less disruption of the normal colonic anaerobic microflora [49,79-82].
In a phase III randomized trial including 629 patients with nonsevere C. difficile infection, clinical cure rates with fidaxomicin (200 mg orally twice daily) and vancomycin (125 mg orally four times daily) were similar, but recurrence of C. difficile infection occurred significantly less often with fidaxomicin than with vancomycin among patients with non–North American pulsed field type 1 (NAP1) strains (10 versus 28 percent in the modified intention-to-treat population) . Lower recurrence rates were not seen among patients with the NAP1 strain. (See "Clostridium difficile in adults: Epidemiology, microbiology, and pathophysiology", section on 'Hypervirulent strain: NAP1/BI/027'.)
Fidaxomicin may be an appropriate therapy in patients with recurrent CDI or perhaps as initial therapy in patients at high risk of developing recurrent disease , although parameters for its most appropriate use are still being defined.
●Rifaximin – Small case series have suggested that sequential therapy with vancomycin followed by rifaximin may be effective for the treatment of recurrent CDI [85,86]. In one series, eight women with recurrent CDI received a two-week course of rifaximin when they were asymptomatic, immediately after completing their last course of vancomycin. Seven patients had no further recurrence of infection .
Use of secondary prophylaxis during concomitant antibiotic use may be useful for prevention of recurrent infection; this is discussed further separately. (See "Clostridium difficile infection: Prevention and control", section on 'Preventing a recurrent episode'.)
ALTERNATIVE THERAPIES — Other therapeutic options for C. difficile infection (CDI) are being developed, and drugs used for other infections are being studied as alternatives to metronidazole and vancomycin .
●Fecal microbiota transplant – Fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) may be useful for treatment of patients with recurrent CDI; further study is needed to identify the patients most likely to benefit . FMT is discussed further separately. (See "Fecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection".)
●Probiotics – Studies regarding benefit of probiotics are inconclusive; the data are presented separately. (See "Clostridium difficile and probiotics" and "Probiotics for gastrointestinal diseases", section on 'Antibiotic-associated diarrhea'.)
●Monoclonal antibodies – Adjunctive use of monoclonal antibodies against C. difficile toxin appears to reduce the recurrence rate of C. difficile infection [89,90]. Bezlotoxumab (a monoclonal antibody that binds to C. difficile toxin B) received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2016 for secondary prevention of C. difficile infection in patients at high risk for recurrence (including patients >65 years of age and those with a prior history of CDI). Two randomized trials including more than 2500 patients demonstrated that use of bezlotoxumab together with standard oral antibiotic therapy was associated with a significantly lower rate of recurrent infection than oral antibiotic therapy alone (17 versus 28 percent in the first trial; findings were similar in the second trial) . The response to bezlotoxumab did not appear to vary by the antibiotic used (metronidazole, vancomycin, fidaxomicin), although the study was not designed to evaluate this question. The addition of actoxumab (a monoclonal antibody that binds to C. difficile toxin A) did not improve efficacy. There remain a number of unresolved issues to guide placement of bezlotoxumab in perspective with other approaches to treatment of C. difficile infection (including fecal microbiota transplant); these include identifying which patients are most likely to benefit as well as cost-effectiveness analyses.
●Alternative antibiotics – A meta-analysis of 12 studies including 1157 participants evaluated eight different antibiotics for the treatment of CDI: vancomycin, metronidazole, fusidic acid, nitazoxanide, teicoplanin, rifampin, rifaximin, and bacitracin . In paired comparisons, no single antibiotic was clearly superior to others. Combination therapy has been tried without success . Nitazoxanide may be as effective as vancomycin (as suggested by a randomized trial of 50 CDI patients), although the small sample precluded conclusions about noninferiority of nitazoxanide to vancomycin . Teicoplanin may be at least as effective as vancomycin or metronidazole, although it is costly and is not available in the United States [17,93].
●Intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) – IVIG contains C. difficile antitoxin and has been used in some patients with relapsing or severe C. difficile colitis. Although there are case reports suggesting IVIG may be a useful addition to antibiotic therapy for refractory CDI [94-96], a retrospective review of 18 patients who received IVIG demonstrated no significant difference in clinical outcomes compared with 18 matched control cases .
●Anion-binding resins – The importance of toxin production in the pathophysiology of C. difficile diarrhea has prompted consideration of anion-binding resins as a possible alternative to antimicrobial therapy . An advantage of resin therapy is that the bowel flora is not altered, as occurs with vancomycin or metronidazole. This may allow more rapid reconstitution of the normal colonic flora.
The anion-binding resins colestipol and cholestyramine are not effective as primary therapy for C. difficile colitis [99,100], although they may be beneficial as adjunctive therapy for relapsing infection . In a series of 11 patients with relapsing CDI, the administration of colestipol with tapered vancomycin led to sustained resolution in all patients .
Anion-exchange resins bind vancomycin as well as toxins; thus, the resin must be taken at least two or three hours apart from the vancomycin . Suggested regimens are colestipol (5 g every 12 hours) or cholestyramine (4 g three or four times daily) for one to two weeks, usually with vancomycin.
Tolevamer is a C. difficile toxin-binding resin developed specifically for CDI [43,102]. Preliminary studies with tolevamer showed promising results, although subsequent large trials have found it to be inferior to both vancomycin and metronidazole as primary therapy for CDI [42,43].
SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS — Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Clostridium difficile infection".)
INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS — UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, "The Basics" and "Beyond the Basics." The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th grade reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who want a general overview and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are longer, more sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th grade reading level and are best for patients who want in-depth information and are comfortable with some medical jargon.
Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to print or e-mail these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles on a variety of subjects by searching on "patient info" and the keyword(s) of interest.)
●Beyond the Basics topics (see "Patient education: Antibiotic-associated diarrhea caused by Clostridium difficile (Beyond the Basics)")
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
●The initial step in the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is cessation of the inciting antibiotic as soon as possible. Infection control practices must be implemented, including contact precautions and hand hygiene. Hand hygiene with soap and water may be more effective than alcohol-based hand sanitizers in removing C. difficile spores, since C. difficile spores are resistant to killing by alcohol. Therefore, use of soap and water is favored over alcohol-based hand sanitization in the setting of a CDI outbreak, although thus far no studies have demonstrated superiority of soap and water in non-outbreak settings. (See 'General management principles' above.)
●For treatment of severe CDI, we recommend vancomycin 125 mg four times daily for 10 to 14 days (Grade 1B). For patients with severe disease who do not demonstrate clinical improvement, we suggest treatment with oral vancomycin 500 mg four times daily (Grade 2C); fidaxomicin may be considered in patients who cannot tolerate vancomycin, although more data are needed. In critically ill patients with fulminant or refractory disease, we suggest oral vancomycin 500 mg four times daily and intravenous metronidazole 500 mg every eight hours (Grade 2C); fidaxomicin may be considered in patients who cannot tolerate vancomycin, although more data are needed. (See 'Antibiotic therapy' above.)
●For treatment of severe disease in patients with profound ileus, we suggest addition of intracolonic vancomycin (Grade 2C), but there is risk of colonic perforation. Therefore, use of intracolonic vancomycin should be restricted to patients who are not responsive to oral therapy, and the procedure should be performed by personnel with expertise in administering enemas. (See 'Antibiotic therapy' above.)
●For treatment of a second recurrence of CDI, we suggest intermittent and tapering vancomycin therapy or fidaxomicin (table 1) (Grade 2B). For treatment of subsequent recurrences of CDI, we suggest administering either fidaxomicin or vancomycin followed by rifaximin (Grade 2C). (See 'Subsequent recurrences' above.)
●We recommend urgent surgical evaluation for patients with a white blood cell count ≥20,000 cells/microL and/or a plasma lactate between 2.2 and 4.9 mEq/L (Grade 1B). In addition, surgical intervention should be strongly considered in the setting of peritoneal signs, severe ileus, or toxic megacolon. (See 'Surgery' above.)
●Potential alternative therapies requiring further investigation prior to routine use include new antibiotic agents, binding resins, intravenous immune globulin, and fecal bacteriotherapy. (See 'Alternative therapies' above.)
- Cohen SH, Gerding DN, Johnson S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the society for healthcare epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the infectious diseases society of America (IDSA). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010; 31:431.
- Kelly CP, LaMont JT. Clostridium difficile--more difficult than ever. N Engl J Med 2008; 359:1932.
- Bagdasarian N, Rao K, Malani PN. Diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile in adults: a systematic review. JAMA 2015; 313:398.
- Hu MY, Katchar K, Kyne L, et al. Prospective derivation and validation of a clinical prediction rule for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Gastroenterology 2009; 136:1206.
- Mullane KM, Miller MA, Weiss K, et al. Efficacy of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin as therapy for Clostridium difficile infection in individuals taking concomitant antibiotics for other concurrent infections. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 53:440.
- Wilcox MH, Howe R. Diarrhoea caused by Clostridium difficile: response time for treatment with metronidazole and vancomycin. J Antimicrob Chemother 1995; 36:673.
- Koo HL, Koo DC, Musher DM, DuPont HL. Antimotility agents for the treatment of Clostridium difficile diarrhea and colitis. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 48:598.
- Surawicz CM, Brandt LJ, Binion DG, et al. Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Clostridium difficile infections. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108:478.
- Nelson R. Antibiotic treatment for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; :CD004610.
- Drekonja DM, Butler M, MacDonald R, et al. Comparative effectiveness of Clostridium difficile treatments: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155:839.
- Zar FA, Bakkanagari SR, Moorthi KM, Davis MB. A comparison of vancomycin and metronidazole for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, stratified by disease severity. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 45:302.
- Pépin J, Valiquette L, Alary ME, et al. Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in a region of Quebec from 1991 to 2003: a changing pattern of disease severity. CMAJ 2004; 171:466.
- Rubin MS, Bodenstein LE, Kent KC. Severe Clostridium difficile colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38:350.
- Debast SB, Bauer MP, Kuijper EJ, European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: update of the treatment guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Microbiol Infect 2014; 20 Suppl 2:1.
- Pépin J, Routhier S, Gagnon S, Brazeau I. Management and outcomes of a first recurrence of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in Quebec, Canada. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 42:758.
- Nelson RL, Suda KJ, Evans CT. Antibiotic treatment for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 3:CD004610.
- Wenisch C, Parschalk B, Hasenhündl M, et al. Comparison of vancomycin, teicoplanin, metronidazole, and fusidic acid for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis 1996; 22:813.
- Teasley DG, Gerding DN, Olson MM, et al. Prospective randomised trial of metronidazole versus vancomycin for Clostridium-difficile-associated diarrhoea and colitis. Lancet 1983; 2:1043.
- Carmeli Y, Eliopoulos GM, Samore MH. Antecedent treatment with different antibiotic agents as a risk factor for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus. Emerg Infect Dis 2002; 8:802.
- Al-Nassir WN, Sethi AK, Li Y, et al. Both oral metronidazole and oral vancomycin promote persistent overgrowth of vancomycin-resistant enterococci during treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2008; 52:2403.
- Pepin J, Alary ME, Valiquette L, et al. Increasing risk of relapse after treatment of Clostridium difficile colitis in Quebec, Canada. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 40:1591.
- Pépin J, Valiquette L, Gagnon S, et al. Outcomes of Clostridium difficile-associated disease treated with metronidazole or vancomycin before and after the emergence of NAP1/027. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102:2781.
- Pepin J. Vancomycin for the treatment of Clostridium difficile Infection: for whom is this expensive bullet really magic? Clin Infect Dis 2008; 46:1493.
- Borody TJ, Warren EF, Leis SM, et al. Bacteriotherapy using fecal flora: toying with human motions. J Clin Gastroenterol 2004; 38:475.
- Fekety R, Silva J, Kauffman C, et al. Treatment of antibiotic-associated Clostridium difficile colitis with oral vancomycin: comparison of two dosage regimens. Am J Med 1989; 86:15.
- McFarland LV, Elmer GW, Surawicz CM. Breaking the cycle: treatment strategies for 163 cases of recurrent Clostridium difficile disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97:1769.
- Gerding DN. Metronidazole for Clostridium difficile-associated disease: is it okay for Mom? Clin Infect Dis 2005; 40:1598.
- Bolton RP, Culshaw MA. Faecal metronidazole concentrations during oral and intravenous therapy for antibiotic associated colitis due to Clostridium difficile. Gut 1986; 27:1169.
- Johnson S, Homann SR, Bettin KM, et al. Treatment of asymptomatic Clostridium difficile carriers (fecal excretors) with vancomycin or metronidazole. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1992; 117:297.
- Olsson-Liljequist B, Nord CE. In vitro susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to nitroimidazoles. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl 1981; 26:42.
- Brazier JS, Fawley W, Freeman J, Wilcox MH. Reduced susceptibility of Clostridium difficile to metronidazole. J Antimicrob Chemother 2001; 48:741.
- Wong SS, Woo PC, Luk WK, Yuen KY. Susceptibility testing of Clostridium difficile against metronidazole and vancomycin by disk diffusion and Etest. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1999; 34:1.
- Barbut F, Decré D, Burghoffer B, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibilities and serogroups of clinical strains of Clostridium difficile isolated in France in 1991 and 1997. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999; 43:2607.
- Baines SD, O'Connor R, Freeman J, et al. Emergence of reduced susceptibility to metronidazole in Clostridium difficile. J Antimicrob Chemother 2008; 62:1046.
- Bartlett JG, Tedesco FJ, Shull S, et al. Symptomatic relapse after oral vancomycin therapy of antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis. Gastroenterology 1980; 78:431.
- Peláez T, Alcalá L, Alonso R, et al. Reassessment of Clostridium difficile susceptibility to metronidazole and vancomycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002; 46:1647.
- McDonald LC, Killgore GE, Thompson A, et al. An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:2433.
- Loo VG, Poirier L, Miller MA, et al. A predominantly clonal multi-institutional outbreak of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea with high morbidity and mortality. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:2442.
- Hu MY, Maroo S, Kyne L, et al. A prospective study of risk factors and historical trends in metronidazole failure for Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6:1354.
- Lamontagne F, Labbé AC, Haeck O, et al. Impact of emergency colectomy on survival of patients with fulminant Clostridium difficile colitis during an epidemic caused by a hypervirulent strain. Ann Surg 2007; 245:267.
- Kelly CP, Pothoulakis C, LaMont JT. Clostridium difficile colitis. N Engl J Med 1994; 330:257.
- Johnson S, Louie TJ, Gerding DN, et al. Vancomycin, metronidazole, or tolevamer for Clostridium difficile infection: results from two multinational, randomized, controlled trials. Clin Infect Dis 2014; 59:345.
- Louie T, Gerson M, Grimard D, et al. Results of a phase III trial comparing tolevamer, vancomycin and metronidazole in Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) [abstract K-425a]. In: Program and abstracts of the 47th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (Chicago, IL). Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 2007.
- Bartlett JG. The case for vancomycin as the preferred drug for treatment of Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 46:1489.
- Bartlett JG, Perl TM. The new Clostridium difficile--what does it mean? N Engl J Med 2005; 353:2503.
- Nielsen ND, Layton BA, McDonald LC, et al. Changing epidemiology of Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Infect Dis Clin Pract 2006; 14:296.
- Institut National de Santé du Québec. Prévention et contrôle de la diarrhée nosocomiale associée au Clostridium difficile au Québec [in French], 3rd ed, Institut National de Santé du Québec, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada 2005.
- Stevens VW, Nelson RE, Schwab-Daugherty EM, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Vancomycin and Metronidazole for the Prevention of Recurrence and Death in Patients With Clostridium difficile Infection. JAMA Intern Med 2017.
- Hecht DW, Galang MA, Sambol SP, et al. In vitro activities of 15 antimicrobial agents against 110 toxigenic clostridium difficile clinical isolates collected from 1983 to 2004. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007; 51:2716.
- Gerding DN. Is there a relationship between vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infection and Clostridium difficile infection? Clin Infect Dis 1997; 25 Suppl 2:S206.
- Rokas KE, Johnson JW, Beardsley JR, et al. The Addition of Intravenous Metronidazole to Oral Vancomycin is Associated With Improved Mortality in Critically Ill Patients With Clostridium difficile Infection. Clin Infect Dis 2015; 61:934.
- Kleinfeld DI, Sharpe RJ, Donta ST. Parenteral therapy for antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis. J Infect Dis 1988; 157:389.
- Friedenberg F, Fernandez A, Kaul V, et al. Intravenous metronidazole for the treatment of Clostridium difficile colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44:1176.
- Wenisch JM, Schmid D, Tucek G, et al. A prospective cohort study on hospital mortality due to Clostridium difficile infection. Infection 2012; 40:479.
- Herpers BL, Vlaminckx B, Burkhardt O, et al. Intravenous tigecycline as adjunctive or alternative therapy for severe refractory Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 48:1732.
- Apisarnthanarak A, Razavi B, Mundy LM. Adjunctive intracolonic vancomycin for severe Clostridium difficile colitis: case series and review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 35:690.
- Shetler K, Nieuwenhuis R, Wren SM, Triadafilopoulos G. Decompressive colonoscopy with intracolonic vancomycin administration for the treatment of severe pseudomembranous colitis. Surg Endosc 2001; 15:653.
- Nathanson DR, Sheahan M, Chao L, Wallack MK. Intracolonic use of vancomycin for treatment of clostridium difficile colitis in a patient with a diverted colon: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44:1871.
- Halsey J. Current and future treatment modalities for Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2008; 65:705.
- Apisarnthanarak A, Khoury H, Reinus WR, et al. Severe Clostridium difficile colitis: the role of intracolonic vancomycin? Am J Med 2002; 112:328.
- Goodpasture HC, Dolan PJ Jr, Jacobs ER, Meredith WT. Pseudomembranous colitis & antibiotics. Kans Med 1986; 87:133, 146.
- Silva J Jr. Update on pseudomembranous colitis. West J Med 1989; 151:644.
- McMaster-Baxter NL, Musher DM. Clostridium difficile: recent epidemiologic findings and advances in therapy. Pharmacotherapy 2007; 27:1029.
- Sailhamer EA, Carson K, Chang Y, et al. Fulminant Clostridium difficile colitis: patterns of care and predictors of mortality. Arch Surg 2009; 144:433.
- Miller MA. Clinical management of Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 45 Suppl 2:S122.
- Steele SR, McCormick J, Melton GB, et al. Practice parameters for the management of Clostridium difficile infection. Dis Colon Rectum 2015; 58:10.
- Dallal RM, Harbrecht BG, Boujoukas AJ, et al. Fulminant Clostridium difficile: an underappreciated and increasing cause of death and complications. Ann Surg 2002; 235:363.
- Koss K, Clark MA, Sanders DS, et al. The outcome of surgery in fulminant Clostridium difficile colitis. Colorectal Dis 2006; 8:149.
- Morris JB, Zollinger RM Jr, Stellato TA. Role of surgery in antibiotic-induced pseudomembranous enterocolitis. Am J Surg 1990; 160:535.
- Longo WE, Mazuski JE, Virgo KS, et al. Outcome after colectomy for Clostridium difficile colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47:1620.
- Neal MD, Alverdy JC, Hall DE, et al. Diverting loop ileostomy and colonic lavage: an alternative to total abdominal colectomy for the treatment of severe, complicated Clostridium difficile associated disease. Ann Surg 2011; 254:423.
- Fekety R, McFarland LV, Surawicz CM, et al. Recurrent Clostridium difficile diarrhea: characteristics of and risk factors for patients enrolled in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial. Clin Infect Dis 1997; 24:324.
- Louie TJ, Miller MA, Mullane KM, et al. Fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection. N Engl J Med 2011; 364:422.
- Cornely OA, Miller MA, Louie TJ, et al. Treatment of first recurrence of Clostridium difficile infection: fidaxomicin versus vancomycin. Clin Infect Dis 2012; 55 Suppl 2:S154.
- McFarland LV, Surawicz CM, Greenberg RN, et al. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of Saccharomyces boulardii in combination with standard antibiotics for Clostridium difficile disease. JAMA 1994; 271:1913.
- Tedesco FJ, Gordon D, Fortson WC. Approach to patients with multiple relapses of antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis. Am J Gastroenterol 1985; 80:867.
- Hota SS, Sales V, Tomlinson G, et al. Oral Vancomycin Followed by Fecal Transplantation Versus Tapering Oral Vancomycin Treatment for Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Infect Dis 2017; 64:265.
- Venugopal AA, Johnson S. Fidaxomicin: a novel macrocyclic antibiotic approved for treatment of Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis 2012; 54:568.
- Ackermann G, Löffler B, Adler D, Rodloff AC. In vitro activity of OPT-80 against Clostridium difficile. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48:2280.
- Finegold SM, Molitoris D, Vaisanen ML, et al. In vitro activities of OPT-80 and comparator drugs against intestinal bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48:4898.
- Credito KL, Appelbaum PC. Activity of OPT-80, a novel macrocycle, compared with those of eight other agents against selected anaerobic species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48:4430.
- Tannock GW, Munro K, Taylor C, et al. A new macrocyclic antibiotic, fidaxomicin (OPT-80), causes less alteration to the bowel microbiota of Clostridium difficile-infected patients than does vancomycin. Microbiology 2010; 156:3354.
- Cornely OA, Nathwani D, Ivanescu C, et al. Clinical efficacy of fidaxomicin compared with vancomycin and metronidazole in Clostridium difficile infections: a meta-analysis and indirect treatment comparison. J Antimicrob Chemother 2014; 69:2892.
- Eyre DW, Babakhani F, Griffiths D, et al. Whole-genome sequencing demonstrates that fidaxomicin is superior to vancomycin for preventing reinfection and relapse of infection with Clostridium difficile. J Infect Dis 2014; 209:1446.
- Johnson S, Schriever C, Galang M, et al. Interruption of recurrent Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea episodes by serial therapy with vancomycin and rifaximin. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44:846.
- Garey KW, Ghantoji SS, Shah DN, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study to assess the ability of rifaximin to prevent recurrent diarrhoea in patients with Clostridium difficile infection. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011; 66:2850.
- Curry SR, Marsh JW, Shutt KA, et al. High frequency of rifampin resistance identified in an epidemic Clostridium difficile clone from a large teaching hospital. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 48:425.
- Treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD). Med Lett Drugs Ther 2006; 48:89.
- Lowy I, Molrine DC, Leav BA, et al. Treatment with monoclonal antibodies against Clostridium difficile toxins. N Engl J Med 2010; 362:197.
- Wilcox MH, Gerding DN, Poxton IR, et al. Bezlotoxumab for Prevention of Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection. N Engl J Med 2017; 376:305.
- Lagrotteria D, Holmes S, Smieja M, et al. Prospective, randomized inpatient study of oral metronidazole versus oral metronidazole and rifampin for treatment of primary episode of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 43:547.
- Musher DM, Logan N, Bressler AM, et al. Nitazoxanide versus vancomycin in Clostridium difficile infection: a randomized, double-blind study. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 48:e41.
- de Lalla F, Nicolin R, Rinaldi E, et al. Prospective study of oral teicoplanin versus oral vancomycin for therapy of pseudomembranous colitis and Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1992; 36:2192.
- Leung DY, Kelly CP, Boguniewicz M, et al. Treatment with intravenously administered gamma globulin of chronic relapsing colitis induced by Clostridium difficile toxin. J Pediatr 1991; 118:633.
- Salcedo J, Keates S, Pothoulakis C, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for severe Clostridium difficile colitis. Gut 1997; 41:366.
- Warny M, Denie C, Delmée M, Lefebvre C. Gamma globulin administration in relapsing Clostridium difficile-induced pseudomembranous colitis with a defective antibody response to toxin A. Acta Clin Belg 1995; 50:36.
- Juang P, Skledar SJ, Zgheib NK, et al. Clinical outcomes of intravenous immune globulin in severe clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. Am J Infect Control 2007; 35:131.
- Taylor NS, Bartlett JG. Binding of Clostridium difficile cytotoxin and vancomycin by anion-exchange resins. J Infect Dis 1980; 141:92.
- Mogg GA, Arabi Y, Youngs D, et al. Therapeutic trials of antibiotic associated colitis. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl 1980; :41.
- Kreutzer EW, Milligan FD. Treatment of antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis with cholestyramine resin. Johns Hopkins Med J 1978; 143:67.
- Tedesco FJ. Treatment of recurrent antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis. Am J Gastroenterol 1982; 77:220.
- Louie TJ, Peppe J, Watt CK, et al. Tolevamer, a novel nonantibiotic polymer, compared with vancomycin in the treatment of mild to moderately severe Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 43:411.