Contributor disclosures are reviewed for conflicts of interest by the editorial group. When found, these are addressed by vetting through a multi-level review process, and through requirements for references to be provided to support the content. Appropriately referenced content is required of all authors and must conform to UpToDate standards of evidence.
INTRODUCTION — Hemostasis depends on an adequate number of functional platelets, together with an intact coagulation (clotting factor) system. This topic covers the logistics of platelet use and the indications for platelet transfusion in adults. The approach to the bleeding patient, refractoriness to platelet transfusion, and platelet transfusion in neonates are discussed elsewhere.
PLATELET COLLECTION — There are two ways that platelets can be collected: by isolation from a unit of donated blood, or by apheresis from a donor in the blood bank.
●Pooled platelets – A single unit of platelets can be isolated from every unit of donated blood, by centrifuging the blood within the closed collection system to separate the platelets from the red blood cells (RBCs). The number of platelets per unit varies according to the platelet count of the donor; a yield of 7 x 1010 platelets is typical . Since this number is inadequate to raise the platelet count in an adult recipient, four to six units are pooled to allow transfusion of 3 to 4 x 1011 platelets per transfusion . These are called whole blood-derived or random donor pooled platelets.
Advantages of pooled platelets include lower cost and ease of collection and processing (a separate donation procedure and pheresis equipment are not required). The major disadvantage is recipient exposure to multiple donors in a single transfusion and logistic issues related to bacterial testing.
●Apheresis (single donor) platelets – Platelets can also be collected from volunteer donors in the blood bank, in a one- to two-hour pheresis procedure. Platelets and some white blood cells are removed, and red blood cells and plasma are returned to the donor. A typical apheresis platelet unit provides the equivalent of six or more units of platelets from whole blood (ie, 3 to 6 x 1011 platelets) . In larger donors with high platelet counts, up to three units can be collected in one session. These are called apheresis or single donor platelets.
Advantages of single donor platelets are exposure of the recipient to a single donor rather than multiple donors, and the ability to match donor and recipient characteristics such as HLA type, cytomegalovirus (CMV) status, and blood type for certain recipients. (See 'Ordering platelets' below.)
Issues related to the effects of platelet pheresis on the donor are covered elsewhere. (See "Blood donor screening: Procedures and processes to enhance safety for the blood recipient and the blood donor", section on 'Apheresis platelet donors'.)
Both pooled and apheresis platelets contain some white blood cells (WBC) that were collected along with the platelets. These WBC can cause febrile non-hemolytic transfusion reactions (FNHTR), alloimmunization, and transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease (ta-GVHD) in some patients.
Platelet products also contain plasma, which can be implicated in adverse reactions including transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) and anaphylaxis. (See 'Complications of platelet transfusion' below.)
Several strategies are used to prevent the complications associated with WBC and plasma contamination of platelets. (See 'Ordering platelets' below.)
Platelets concentrates also contain a small number of RBCs that express Rh antigens on their surface (platelets do not express Rh antigens). The small numbers of RBCs in apheresis platelets negates the issue of Rh alloimmunization in most patients. However, blood banks avoid giving platelets from Rh+ donors to Rh- female patients because of the potential risk of Rh alloimmunization and subsequent hemolytic disease of the newborn. (See "Overview of Rhesus D alloimmunization in pregnancy".)
PLATELET STORAGE AND PATHOGEN REDUCTION — Platelets are stored at room temperature, because cold induces clustering of von Willebrand factor receptors on the platelet surface and morphological changes of the platelets, leading to enhanced clearance by hepatic macrophages and reduced platelet survival in the recipient [3-6].
All cells are more metabolically active at room temperature, so platelets are stored in bags that allow oxygen and carbon dioxide gas exchange. Citrate is included to prevent clotting and maintain proper pH, and dextrose is added as an energy source .
A disadvantage of room temperature storage is the increased growth of bacteria compared with blood products stored in the refrigerator or freezer. (See 'Complications of platelet transfusion' below.)
Strategies for reducing exposure to pathogens in the platelet product include:
●Donor screening for bloodborne pathogens (see "Blood donor screening: Laboratory testing", section on 'Infectious disease screening' and "Blood donor screening: Procedures and processes to enhance safety for the blood recipient and the blood donor", section on 'Protection of the recipient')
●Proper skin sterilization techniques during collection, and discarding the first 15 to 30 mL of blood collected, which is most likely to be contaminated by skin bacteria
●Performing tests to screen for bacterial contamination, such as automated culture-based assays, and rapid point-of-issue tests (see "Transfusion-transmitted bacterial infection", section on 'Detection of contamination')
●Using blood products that have been subjected to pathogen inactivation or reduction treatment (see "Pathogen inactivation of blood products", section on 'Platelets')
The shelf life of platelets stored at room temperature is five days because of the bacterial infection risk that increases in relationship to the storage duration. This short shelf life contributes to the greater sensitivity of platelet inventory to shortages.
INDICATIONS FOR PLATELET TRANSFUSION — Platelets can be transfused therapeutically (ie, to treat active bleeding or in preparation for an invasive procedure that would cause bleeding), or prophylactically (ie, to prevent spontaneous bleeding).
Actively bleeding patient — Actively bleeding patients with thrombocytopenia should be transfused with platelets immediately to keep platelet counts above 50,000/microL in most bleeding situations, and above 100,000/microL if there is disseminated intravascular coagulation or central nervous system bleeding. (See "Clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation in adults", section on 'Treatment' and "Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: Treatment and prognosis", section on 'Initial treatment'.).
Other factors contributing to bleeding should also be addressed. These include:
●Surgical or anatomic defect
●Infection or inflammation
●Acquired or inherited platelet function defect
The dose and frequency of platelet transfusions will depend on the platelet count and the severity of bleeding. (See 'Dose' below.)
Preparation for an invasive procedure — Platelets are transfused in preparation for an invasive procedure if the thrombocytopenia is severe and the risks of bleeding are deemed high. Most of the data used to determine bleeding risk come from retrospective studies of patients who are afebrile and have thrombocytopenia but not coagulopathy . Typical platelet count thresholds that are used for some common procedures are as follows:
●Neurosurgery or ocular surgery – 100,000/microL
●Most other major surgery – 50,000/microL
●Endoscopic procedures – 50,000/microL for therapeutic procedures; 20,000/microL for low risk diagnostic procedures (see "Endoscopic procedures in patients with disorders of hemostasis", section on 'Procedure-related bleeding risk')
●Bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) – 20,000 to 30,000/microL 
●Central line placement – 20,000/microL 
●Lumbar puncture – 10,000 to 20,000/microL in patients with hematologic malignancies and greater than 40,000 to 50,000 in patients without hematologic malignancies, but lower in patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) [10-12]
●Epidural anesthesia – 80,000/microL 
●Bone marrow aspiration/biopsy – 20,000/microL
Prevention of spontaneous bleeding — Prophylactic transfusion is used to prevent spontaneous bleeding in patients at high risk of bleeding. The threshold for prophylactic transfusion varies depending on the patient and on the clinical scenario. (See 'Specific clinical scenarios' below.)
There are no ideal tests for predicting who will bleed spontaneously . Studies of patients with thrombocytopenia suggest that patients can bleed even with platelet counts greater than 50,000/microL . However, bleeding is much more likely at platelet counts less than 5000/microL. Among individuals with platelet counts between 5000/microL and 50,000/microL, clinical findings can be helpful in decision-making regarding platelet transfusion.
●The platelet count at which a patient bled previously can be a good predictor of future bleeding.
●Petechial bleeding and ecchymoses are generally not thought to be predictive of serious bleeding, whereas mucosal bleeding and epistaxis (so-called "wet" bleeding) are thought to be predictive.
●Coexisting inflammation, infection, and fever also increase bleeding risk.
●The underlying condition responsible for a patient's thrombocytopenia also may help in estimating the bleeding risk. As an example, some patients with ITP often tolerate very low platelet counts without bleeding, while patients with some acute leukemias that are associated with coagulopathy (eg, acute promyelocytic leukemia) can have bleeding at higher platelet counts (eg, 30,000 to 50,000/microL). (See 'Specific clinical scenarios' below.)
●Compared with adults, children with bone marrow suppression may be more likely to experience bleeding at the same degree of thrombocytopenia. In a secondary subgroup analysis of the PLADO trial, in which patients were randomly assigned to different platelet doses, children had more days of bleeding, more severe bleeding, and required more platelet transfusions than adults with similar platelet counts . However, these findings do not suggest a different threshold for platelet transfusion in children, as the increased risk of bleeding was distributed across a wide range of platelet counts.
●Tests for platelet-dependent hemostasis (ie, bleeding time, thromboelastography, and other point of care tests) are generally not used to predict bleeding in thrombocytopenic patients. (See "Platelet function testing", section on 'The in vivo bleeding time' and "Platelet function testing", section on 'Instruments that simulate platelet function in vitro'.)
Therapeutic versus prophylactic transfusion — By convention, most authors use the term "therapeutic transfusion" to refer both to transfusion of platelets to treat active bleeding and transfusion of platelets in preparation for an invasive procedure that could cause bleeding. The term "prophylactic transfusion" is used to refer to platelet transfusion given to prevent spontaneous bleeding.
We use prophylactic platelet transfusion to prevent spontaneous bleeding in most afebrile patients with platelet counts below 10,000/microL due to bone marrow suppression. We use higher thresholds (ie, 30,000/microL) in patients who are febrile or septic. Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) have a coexisting coagulopathy, and we use a platelet transfusion threshold of 30,000 to 50,000/microL for them. (See 'Leukemia and chemotherapy' below.)
Patients with platelet consumption disorders (eg, immune thrombocytopenia [ITP], disseminated intravascular coagulation) and platelet function disorders are typically transfused only for bleeding or, in some cases, invasive procedures. Platelets should not be withheld in bleeding patients with these conditions due to fear of "fueling the fire" of thrombus formation. (See 'Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP)' below and 'TTP or HIT' below and 'Platelet function defects' below.)
Given the need to balance the risk of spontaneous bleeding with the potential complications of unnecessary platelet transfusion, the decision of whether to transfuse platelets based upon a clinical event (ie, for active bleeding or invasive procedures) or at a particular threshold (ie, to prevent spontaneous bleeding) is challenging. Standard practice has evolved to transfusion of platelets at a threshold platelet count of 10,000 to 20,000/microL for most patients with severe hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia due to hematologic malignancies, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) . However, the risks and benefits of reserving platelet transfusion for active bleeding episodes in these patients continue to be evaluated [7,17-20].
●In a randomized trial, 400 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML; patients with APL were excluded) and patients undergoing autologous HCT for hematologic malignancies were assigned to receive platelet transfusions when morning platelet counts were ≤10,000/microL or only for active bleeding . Patients transfused only for active bleeding received fewer platelet transfusions during the 14-day period after induction or consolidation chemotherapy (1.63 versus 2.44 per patient, a 33.5 percent reduction). However, among patients with AML who were transfused only for active bleeding, there were more episodes of major bleeding (six cerebral, four retinal, and one vaginal) and there were two fatal intracranial hemorrhages compared with four retinal hemorrhages among patients transfused for a platelet count ≤10,000/microL. Patients undergoing HCT also experienced more bleeding episodes when transfused only for active bleeding, but most of these were minor.
●In another randomized trial, 600 patients with hematologic malignancies receiving chemotherapy, autologous, or allogeneic HCT were assigned to receive platelet transfusion for a platelet count ≤10,000/microL or only for active bleeding (the Trial of Prophylactic Platelets [TOPPS]) [22-24]. Compared with those who received prophylactic transfusions, patients transfused only for active bleeding received fewer platelet transfusions during the 30-day period after randomization, but had a higher incidence of major bleeding (50 versus 43 percent) and a shorter time to first bleed (1.2 versus 1.7 days) . There were no differences in the duration of hospitalization, and no deaths due to bleeding. In a predefined subgroup analysis, patients undergoing autologous HCT had similar rates of major bleeding whether they were transfused for a platelet count ≤10,000/microL or only for active bleeding (45 and 47 percent).
The findings from these trials support continued use of prophylactic transfusion for patients with hematologic malignancies and HCT until further data become available. Although the findings suggest that reserving platelet transfusion for active bleeding may be safe for some adults undergoing autologous HCT, such a strategy requires intensive monitoring and the ability to perform immediate imaging for suspected CNS or ocular bleeding. We do not recommend reserving platelet transfusion for active bleeding in patients with HCT outside of highly specialized centers with the ability to support this level of vigilance.
SPECIFIC CLINICAL SCENARIOS — There are several common clinical scenarios that raise the questions of whether to transfuse patients prophylactically to prevent bleeding, and, if prophylactic transfusion is used, of what platelet count is the best threshold for transfusion.
Leukemia and chemotherapy — Patients with leukemia, hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), or those being treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy have a suppressed bone marrow that cannot produce adequate platelets. We use prophylactic transfusion in these settings. The thresholds suggested below apply to patients with thrombocytopenia who are afebrile and without active infection. If fever or sepsis is present, higher thresholds may be needed.
●Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) – Patients with AML can have suppressed bone marrow from AML, chemotherapy, or HCT. We use standard dose prophylactic transfusion of these patients at a threshold platelet count of 10,000/microL, and transfusion for any bleeding greater than petechial bleeding. (See 'Dose' below.)
This approach is in line with the 2001 American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines (table 1) and a practice guideline from the AABB . It is supported by randomized trials comparing prophylactic (ie, threshold-based) and therapeutic platelet transfusion, in which patients who did not receive prophylactic transfusion had more severe bleeding [21,25,27]. (See 'Therapeutic versus prophylactic transfusion' above and "Overview of the complications of acute myeloid leukemia", section on 'Bleeding'.)
●Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) – Patients with APL differ from other patients with AML because they often have an associated coagulopathy that puts them at high risk for disseminated intravascular coagulation and bleeding. We prophylactically transfuse these patients at a platelet count of 30,000 to 50,000/microL, and treat any sign of bleeding, especially central nervous system bleeding, with immediate platelet transfusion. (See "Clinical manifestations, pathologic features, and diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia in adults", section on 'Coagulopathy and APL' and "Initial treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia in adults", section on 'Control of coagulopathy'.)
●Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) – Patients with ALL have thrombocytopenia from bone marrow suppression. In addition, these patients are often treated with L-asparaginase, which causes severe hypofibrinogenemia. However, the risk of life-threatening bleeding is low. As an example, in over 2500 children with ALL, only two intracranial hemorrhages occurred, and they were associated with hyperleukocytosis in one case and intracerebral fungal infection in the other . We transfuse adults with ALL at a threshold platelet count of 10,000/microL. The use of platelet transfusion in children with ALL is discussed separately. (See "Overview of the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children and adolescents", section on 'Bleeding'.)
●Chemotherapy for solid tumors – Cancer chemotherapy often makes patients thrombocytopenic from bone marrow suppression. Randomized trials of platelet transfusion threshold in this population have not been performed. Observational studies support a prophylactic platelet transfusion threshold of 10,000/microL . A threshold of 20,000/microL may be appropriate for patients with necrotic tumors. These recommendations are generally consistent with the ASCO 2001 Guidelines (table 1) .
●Hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) – Chemotherapy and radiation therapy administered as part of the conditioning regimen for HCT can be highly bone marrow suppressive, depending on the doses used. We use standard dose prophylactic transfusion of these patients at a threshold platelet count of 10,000/microL, and therapeutic transfusion for any bleeding greater than petechial bleeding. (See "Hematopoietic support after hematopoietic cell transplantation", section on 'Platelet transfusion'.)
●Aplastic anemia – Patients with aplastic anemia do not have a malignancy, but they may have severe thrombocytopenia, and they may be candidates for HCT. Issues related to platelet transfusion in these patients are discussed separately. (See "Treatment of aplastic anemia in adults".)
Prophylactic platelet transfusion for a platelet count ≤10,000/microL in hospitalized patients with thrombocytopenia from therapy-induced bone marrow suppression is consistent with a practice guideline from the AABB .
Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) — Individuals with immune thrombocytopenia produce anti-platelet antibodies that destroy circulating platelets and megakaryocytes in the bone marrow. Circulating platelets in patients with ITP tend to be highly functional, and platelet counts tend to be well above 30,000/microL. Bleeding is rare even in patients with severe thrombocytopenia (ie, platelet count <30,000/microL). (See "Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in adults: Clinical manifestations and diagnosis", section on 'Pathogenesis'.)
Our general approach to platelet transfusion in patients with ITP is to transfuse for bleeding rather than at a specific platelet count. (See "Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in adults: Initial treatment and prognosis", section on 'Indications for treatment'.)
TTP or HIT — Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are disorders in which platelet consumption causes thrombocytopenia and an increased risk of bleeding; but the underlying platelet activation in these conditions also increases the risk of thrombosis.
Platelet transfusions can be helpful or even life-saving in patients with these conditions who are bleeding and/or have anticipated bleeding due to a required invasive procedure (eg, placement of a central venous catheter), and platelet transfusion should not be withheld from a bleeding patient due to concerns that platelet transfusion will exacerbate thrombotic risk. However, platelet transfusions may cause a slightly increased risk of thrombosis in patients with these conditions; thus, we do not use prophylactic platelet transfusions routinely in patients with TTP or HIT in the absence of bleeding or a required invasive procedure.
Support for this approach comes from a large retrospective review of hospitalized patients with TTP and HIT, in which platelet transfusion was associated with a very slight increased risk of arterial thrombosis but not venous thromboembolism . In contrast, the review found that patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) had no increased risk of arterial or venous thrombosis with platelet transfusion. Of note, this was a retrospective study in which sicker patients were more likely to have received platelets, and the temporal relationships between platelet transfusions and thromboses were not assessed.
●TTP – Of 10,624 patients with TTP in the large review mentioned above, approximately 10 percent received a platelet transfusion . Arterial thrombosis occurred in 1.8 percent of patients who received platelets, versus 0.4 percent of patients who did not (absolute increase, 1.4 percent; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 5.8; 95% CI, 1.3-26.6). The rate of venous thrombosis was not different in those who received platelets and those who did not (adjusted OR 1.1; 95% CI 0.5-2.2).
In contrast, a systematic review of patients with TTP who received platelet transfusions, which included retrospective data for 358 patients and prospective data for 54 patients, did not find clear evidence that platelet transfusions were associated with adverse outcomes .
●HIT – Of 6332 patients with HIT in the large review mentioned above, approximately 7 percent received a platelet transfusion . Arterial thrombosis occurred in 6.9 percent of patients who received platelets, versus 3.1 percent of patients who did not (absolute increase, 3.8 percent; adjusted OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.2-9.5). The rate of venous thrombosis was not different in those who received platelets and those who did not (adjusted OR 0.8; 95% CI 0.4-1.7).
In a series of four patients with HIT who received platelet transfusions, two of three with active bleeding had cessation of bleeding following platelet transfusion, and no thromboses occurred; a literature review was not able to identify any complications clearly attributable to platelet transfusion .
Liver disease and DIC — Patients with liver disease and DIC have a complex mixture of procoagulant and anticoagulant defects along with thrombocytopenia, and therefore they are at risk for thrombosis and bleeding. There is no evidence to support the administration of platelets in these patients if they are not bleeding. However, platelet transfusion is justified in patients who have serious bleeding, are at high risk for bleeding (eg, after surgery), or require invasive procedures. (See "Clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation in adults", section on 'Prevention/treatment of bleeding' and "Hemostatic abnormalities in patients with liver disease", section on 'Bleeding'.)
Platelet function defects — Platelet function defects can be inherited or acquired, and may be associated with thrombocytopenia or a normal platelet count. Platelet transfusion in these settings is typically reserved for bleeding.
●Inherited diseases – Platelet function is impaired in Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome, Glanzmann thrombasthenia, and Bernard-Soulier syndrome. Bleeding in patients with these conditions is treated with platelet transfusion, along with other hemostatic agents discussed below. (See "Congenital and acquired disorders of platelet function", section on 'Inherited disorders of platelet function' and 'Alternatives to platelet transfusion' below.)
●Acquired conditions – Uremia, diabetes mellitus, myeloproliferative disorders, and other medical conditions can impair platelet function. Bleeding risk can be reduced by treating the underlying condition. Platelet transfusion is typically reserved for major bleeding in these conditions. (See "Congenital and acquired disorders of platelet function", section on 'Acquired platelet functional disorders'.)
Patients who are febrile or septic can have impaired platelet function. We transfuse these patients for bleeding. We also use a higher threshold for when fever or sepsis coexist with thrombocytopenia (eg, in patients with leukemia). (See 'Leukemia and chemotherapy' above.)
Antiplatelet agents — Aspirin, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), dipyridamole, ADP receptor (P2Y12) inhibitors (eg, clopidogrel, ticlopidine), and GPIIb/IIIa antagonists (eg, abciximab, eptifibatide) are used to prevent thrombosis by interfering with normal platelet function. The antiplatelet effects of these agents are weakest with aspirin and more potent with the P2Y12 inhibitors. (See "Platelet biology", section on 'Drugs with antiplatelet actions'.)
Typically, the approach to treating mild bleeding in a patient taking an antiplatelet agent is to discontinue the drug, assuming a favorable risk-benefit ratio. For more severe bleeding or urgent surgical procedures, high quality evidence regarding the benefit of platelet transfusion is lacking, and some evidence suggests that platelet transfusion may be deleterious. These cases can be complex, however, and we favor an individualized approach based on the complete clinical picture.
Evidence suggesting platelet transfusion is not effective in some sites of severe bleeding comes from the PATCH trial (Platelet Transfusion in Cerebral Hemorrhage), which randomly assigned 190 patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in the setting of aspirin or another antiplatelet agent to receive platelet transfusion or standard care without platelet transfusions . Compared with controls, patients who received platelet transfusions had a higher incidence of a composite outcome of death or shift toward a worse score on the modified Rankin Scale for functional independence. When analyzed separately, the increase in mortality did not reach statistical significance. Serious adverse events were greater with platelet transfusion (42 versus 29 percent); enlargement of the ICH was similar in both groups at approximately 15 percent. The authors did not identify a clear mechanism for the inferior outcomes with platelet transfusion but offered several hypotheses including the possibility of concomitant ischemia, possible proinflammatory effects of platelets, or characteristics of the hemorrhage such as location or etiology. A similar randomized trial is nearing completion . The management of ICH is discussed in detail separately. (See "Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: Treatment and prognosis".)
An approach to platelet transfusion for severe bleeding in the setting of antiplatelet agents was published prior to the PATCH trial, although this noted that there are very few published studies that address this subject and the available evidence is not sufficient to support strong recommendations .
The role of platelet transfusion in the setting of urgent surgical procedures (eg, coronary artery bypass grafting, neurosurgical interventions, and others) also is not well defined. Some clinicians give prophylactic platelet transfusions to patients taking antiplatelet drugs who require major surgery, while other clinicians use platelet transfusion only to treat excessive surgical bleeding [33,34].
Other medications may impair platelet function. As an example, the Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib inhibits platelet aggregation by interfering with activation signals. The role of platelet transfusion in patients with ibrutinib-associated bleeding despite a sufficient platelet count is unknown, and decisions are individualized according to the platelet count and the severity and site of bleeding.
Massive blood loss — Patients with massive blood loss from surgery or trauma are transfused with red blood cells (RBC), resulting in partial replacement of the blood volume with a product lacking platelets and clotting factors. In this setting, we transfuse RBC, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and random donor platelet units in a 1:1:1 ratio. As an example, a patient transfused with six units of RBC would also receive six units of pooled platelets or one apheresis unit (both of which provide approximately 5 x 1011 platelets) and six units of FFP. (See "Initial evaluation and management of shock in adult trauma", section on 'Transfusion of blood products'.)
Cardiopulmonary bypass — Patients who undergo prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass can have thrombocytopenia and impaired platelet function. The use of platelet transfusion in the cardiopulmonary bypass setting is discussed separately. (See "Congenital and acquired disorders of platelet function", section on 'Cardiopulmonary bypass' and "Early noncardiac complications of coronary artery bypass graft surgery", section on 'Bleeding'.)
ORDERING PLATELETS — Several parameters can be specified when ordering platelets.
Dose — A standard dose of platelets for prophylactic therapy in adults is approximately one random donor unit per 10 kg of body weight, which translates to four to six units of pooled platelets or one apheresis unit, both providing approximately 3 to 4 x 1011 platelets [2,26]. A standard pediatric dose is 5 to 10 mL/kg. For prophylactic transfusion there is generally no reason to transfuse platelets more often than once a day. This platelet dosing is expected to raise the platelet count by approximately 30,000/microL within 10 minutes of the infusion. (See 'Platelet count increment' below.)
Clinical trials comparing standard platelet dosing with other doses have been limited to patients with hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia due to bone marrow suppression (eg, leukemia, hematopoietic cell transplant, or chemotherapy). Two large studies that evaluated the use of higher or lower platelet doses in these groups have conflicting results, as illustrated below.
●In the Strategies for Transfusion of Platelets (SToP) trial, patients with hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia were randomly assigned to receive platelet transfusion at standard dose (3 to 6 x 1011 platelets, equivalent to approximately 5 to 10 units) or half dose (1.5 to 3 x 1011 platelets, equivalent to approximately 3 to 5 units) when platelet counts fell below a trigger value (most participating institutions used 10,000/microL) . The trial was halted prematurely (at 119 patients) because of life-threatening bleeding or bleeding requiring transfusion in the low dose arm (3 of 58 patients versus none of 61 in the standard dose arm).
●In the PLAtelet DOse (PLADO) trial, 1272 patients with thrombocytopenia due to chemotherapy or HCT were randomly assigned to receive standard dose (2.2 x 1011 platelets per m2), half dose (1.1 x 1011 per m2), or double dose (4.4 x 1011 per m2) platelet transfusions . The primary endpoint of prolonged mucosal or deep bleeding was similar among all groups (67 to 69 percent). The half dose group received a higher median number of platelet transfusions during the 30-day study period (five in the half dose group versus three in the other groups) but received fewer platelets overall (9.25 × 1011 versus 11.25 × 1011 and 19.63 × 1011 in the standard and double dose groups, respectively).
Given these conflicting results and the logistical issues associated with more frequent platelet transfusion, most centers continue to use standard dose transfusion until further data become available.
In contrast to prophylactic transfusion, patients who are being transfused therapeutically (ie, for active bleeding or in preparation for an invasive procedure), or who have a rapidly dropping platelet count, may require higher dose or more frequent platelet transfusions.
Pooled versus apheresis platelets — The platelet count increment and hemostatic effects of pooled and apheresis platelets are comparable .
Apheresis platelets have the advantages of limiting the recipient exposure to a single donor, which potentially reduces the possibility of infection and alloimmunization; some centers use apheresis platelets exclusively. Many believe it is logistically easier to perform bacterial testing on apheresis platelets compared with pooled platelets. (See 'Complications of platelet transfusion' below.)
Use of apheresis platelets also permits transfusion of platelets from specific donors selected based on HLA matching or platelet cross-matching, CMV status, and ABO group. Patients with confirmed immune mediated platelet refractoriness due to anti-HLA antibodies should receive HLA-matched platelets or platelets negative for the corresponding antigen(s) or cross-match compatible platelets; in other cases, either pooled and apheresis platelets can be used .
Leukoreduction — Leukoreduction removes most of the contaminating white blood cells (WBC) from the platelet transfusion . In some centers leukoreduction is standard practice. In other centers, leukoreduction is used for the following indications:
●Reduction of HLA alloimmunization
●Reduction of CMV transmission
●Reduction of transfusion-associated immunomodulation
●Reduction of lung injury during and after cardiopulmonary bypass
●Reduction of febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions (FNHTR)
Leukoreduction is done by passing platelets through a filter that blocks passage of most white blood cells. Apheresis platelets can be leukoreduced during collection, and pooled platelets can be leukoreduced shortly after collection or at bedside before transfusion.
Leukoreduction can reduce the risks of several potential complications of contaminating WBC, but it is not adequate to prevent transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease (ta-GVHD), because some WBC can pass through the leukoreduction filter. Therefore, irradiation must be used to prevent ta-GVHD. (See "Transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease", section on 'Prevention' and "Leukoreduction to prevent complications of blood transfusion".)
Leukoreduction at the bedside (ie, post storage) is not optimal for reducing FNHTR because bedside leukoreduction does not remove cytokines released from WBC during storage. (See "Leukoreduction to prevent complications of blood transfusion", section on 'Febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions'.)
The only drawback of leukoreduction is the cost.
Irradiation — Platelet irradiation is used to prevent ta-GVHD, in which contaminating WBCs attack host tissues and cause serious, even fatal, outcomes in both immunosuppressed and some immunocompetent individuals. Irradiation damages the nuclei of donor lymphocytes in the transfusion, so that they cannot proliferate and mount an immune response against the recipient. Platelets are anucleate, so their functions are unaffected by irradiation, although there may be a slight effect on platelet survival due to membrane damage . Platelets are irradiated by exposing the bag to 25 Gy from a Cesium source.
Irradiation is not a substitute for leukoreduction, because lymphocytes inactivated by irradiation still express human leukocyte antigens (HLA) on their surfaces and can elicit an anti-HLA antibody response from the host. Irradiation is also inadequate to kill pathogens such as bacteria and viruses. Irradiation is used for the following indications [39-41]:
●Immunosuppression or imminent immunosuppression from hematopoietic cell transplant, solid organ transplant, and cytotoxic chemotherapy.
●Congenital immunodeficiency (eg, DiGeorge syndrome, Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome, Leiner's disease, 5” nucleotidase deficiency).
●Hodgkin lymphoma and other hematologic malignancies.
●Neonatal exchange transfusion.
●Premature, low birth weight neonates. (See "Clinical manifestations, evaluation, and management of neonatal thrombocytopenia", section on 'Platelet transfusion'.)
●A subset of donor-recipient pairs who may be closely, but not completely, HLA matched (ie, relatives and genetically homogeneous populations) . The rationale for this is discussed separately. (See "Transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease", section on 'Partial HLA matching'.)
Irradiation may not be necessary if platelets have been subjected to pathogen reduction protocols that also prevent lymphocyte proliferation (eg, photochemical treatments) . These protocols, which have the added advantage of not requiring a radioactive source, are discussed separately. (See "Pathogen inactivation of blood products", section on 'Methods that damage nucleic acids'.)
CMV — Some CMV seronegative transfusion recipients (eg, immunosuppressed patients) are at greater risk of adverse outcomes from receiving CMV-contaminated blood products than the general population. The AABB (formerly the American Association of Blood Banks) considers transfusion of platelets from CMV negative donors to be equivalent to leukoreduction in reducing this risk. (See "Leukoreduction to prevent complications of blood transfusion".)
ABO, Rh, and HLA matching — Platelets express ABO antigens on their surface, as well as HLA class I antigens. They do not express Rh or HLA class II antigens.
ABO and HLA compatible platelets appear to cause a greater platelet count increment in the recipient, and they can be used to improve responses in patients who have become refractory to platelet transfusion due to alloimmunization . (See "Refractoriness to platelet transfusion therapy", section on 'Management of the alloimmunized patient'.)
Due to inventory constraints, most transfusion services issue ABO mismatched platelets when type-specific platelet products are not available. Clinically significant hemolytic transfusion reactions secondary to transfusion of ABO-incompatible platelet products (eg, group O platelets given to group A patient) are uncommon, but they do occur .
To limit such hemolytic reactions, some transfusion services monitor and limit the volume of ABO incompatible plasma given to a patient via platelet transfusions, or volume-reduce or wash the ABO incompatible platelet products to reduce the plasma content. Some also screen for platelet products with high anti-A or anti-B titers and give products with high titers only to group O patients. However, the critical threshold has not been determined for either the volume of incompatible plasma or the anti-A/B titers. (See "Red blood cell antigens and antibodies", section on 'Blood component transfusion' and "Transfusion-associated immune and non immune-mediated hemolysis".)
The possibility of alloimmunization to red blood cell (RBC) antigens causing hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) in a pregnant woman raises another important issue related to Rh matching of platelets . Although platelets do not express Rh antigens, platelet products contain small numbers of RBCs, which could be Rh incompatible with the recipient. Thus, when an Rh(D)-negative woman of childbearing age receives a platelet transfusion, platelets from an Rh(D)-negative donor are used, in order to prevent alloimmunization and HDFN. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) advises administration of Rho(D) immune globulin in this setting . Even if this is not done and platelets from an Rh(D)-positive donor are used, the risk of alloimmunization remains low. This was illustrated in a retrospective analysis of 1014 Rh(D)-negative patients who received 6043 platelet transfusions from Rh+ donors (89 percent from pooled platelets); in this series no patients who received only apheresis platelets developed anti-RhD antibodies, and 12 of 315 (3.8 percent) who received pooled platelets developed anti-RhD antibodies . However, in a series of 59 Rh(D)-negative patients transfused with platelets from an Rh(D)-positive donor for a non-hematologic condition such as pneumonia or surgery (typical dose, one to three units, given without Rh(D) immune globulin), alloantibodies to Rh(D) were detected in eight (13.5 percent) .
To further reduce the risk of alloimmunization if only Rh+ platelets are available, Rh(D) immune globulin can be coadministered with platelet transfusions. Each dose of Rh(D) immune globulin is considered sufficient to prevent alloimmunization for up to 15 mL of Rh(D)-positive RBCs, and most units of platelets do not contain more than 0.5 mL of RBCs. Thus, a single dose of Rh(D) immune globulin is likely to be sufficient even if several units of platelets are transfused. If necessary, this can be repeated once every eight weeks (ie, a similar interval to that used to prevent HDFN). (See "Overview of Rhesus D alloimmunization in pregnancy" and "Prevention of Rh(D) alloimmunization in pregnancy".)
White blood cells present in HLA matched platelet products can cause transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease (ta-GVHD), so all HLA-matched platelets must be irradiated. (See "Transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease", section on 'Partial HLA matching'.)
Platelet additive solutions — After collection, platelets can be resuspended in one of several platelet additive solutions (PAS), as a substitute for a portion of the associated plasma. PAS consist of salts, buffers, and sometimes glucose . Use of PAS platelets decreases but does not eliminate donor plasma exposure, and PAS may provide a less labor-intensive option for reducing allergic transfusion reactions than platelet washing or volume-reduction.
Clinical experience with PAS platelets is limited, and decisions regarding when to use them may depend on the incremental costs and expected benefits. Local availability of PAS platelets may vary, and institution-specific guidelines regarding their use should be followed. One strategy is to use PAS AP for patients without a coagulopathy (since PAS AP contain less plasma than non-PAS AP) and/or patients who have had minor allergic transfusion reactions .
A reduction in allergic transfusion reactions with PAS platelets has been demonstrated in two randomized trials using PAS available in Europe [50,51].
●In one trial of patients receiving multiple platelet transfusions (324 transfusions in 21 patients), platelets resuspended in 65 percent PAS with 35 percent plasma were associated with fewer allergic reactions than platelets in 100 percent plasma (5 versus 12 percent) . The platelet count increases following transfusion were slightly lower with PAS platelets than non-PAS platelets (corrected count interval [CCI] at 20 hours 10,000 versus 12,000/microL). (See "Refractoriness to platelet transfusion therapy", section on 'Measuring response to platelet transfusion'.)
●In a trial that randomly assigned 168 patients to PAS versus non-PAS platelets, mild transfusion reactions were seen less commonly with PAS compared with non-PAS platelets (2 versus 6 percent) . CCI was slightly lower with PAS compared with non-PAS platelets in this trial as well (CCI at 24 hours 7000 versus 8000/microL).
Neither trial showed a difference in bleeding complications with PAS versus non-PAS platelets.
A large retrospective study (5078 patients) compared outcomes with apheresis platelets resuspended a PAS solution approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (InterSol, 65 percent, with 35 percent plasma) versus 100 percent plasma . The incidence of allergic transfusion reactions was reduced with PAS apheresis platelets (PAS AP) compared with non-PAS AP (1.01 versus 1.85 percent; relative risk [RR] 0.54; 95% CI 0.30-0.99). The incidence of febrile non-hemolytic transfusion reactions did not differ. Among individuals for whom paired PAS AP and non-PAS AP transfusions could be compared, there was no difference in the CCI at 12 to 24 hours, although PAS AP were associated with a slight reduction in CCI at four hours compared with non-PAS AP.
The use of PAS platelets may not be possible when HLA matched or CMV-negative products are needed. PAS platelets can be irradiated.
Other special modifications — Patients with known IgA deficiency who have a history of anaphylactic transfusion reactions or demonstrate anti-IgA antibodies can be transfused with platelets that have been washed to remove IgA-containing plasma or obtained from IgA deficient donors. (See "Selective IgA deficiency: Management and prognosis", section on 'Safe administration of blood products'.)
In addition, volume-reduced platelets can be used when exposure to ABO incompatible plasma needs to be limited, or for transfusion of volume-sensitive patients.
As noted above and separately, platelets can also be treated with a pathogen-inactivation method. (See 'Platelet storage and pathogen reduction' above and "Pathogen inactivation of blood products", section on 'Platelets'.)
Infusion rate — For an average sized adult, six units of pooled platelets or one apheresis unit of platelets is transfused over approximately 20 to 30 minutes. Patients at risk for transfusion associated circulatory overload (TACO) can be transfused at a slower rate as long as the transfusion is completed within four hours of issuance from the blood bank. (See "Transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO)", section on 'Prevention'.)
COMPLICATIONS OF PLATELET TRANSFUSION — Platelet transfusion carries several risks. The relative frequency of complications with apheresis versus whole blood-derived, pooled platelets have not been studied in large randomized trials. A 2008 systematic review and meta-analysis that evaluated several small randomized trials (mostly with fewer than 100 patients) found a greater incidence of reactions with whole blood-derived platelets; however, this was no longer significant after controlling for the use of leukoreduction . A 2016 study involving almost 800,000 platelet transfusions in France found that apheresis platelets were associated with a greater frequency of adverse reactions (approximately 6 per 1000 for apheresis platelets versus 2 per 1000 for whole blood-derived platelets) . In this study, all platelets were leukoreduced (during collection for apheresis, and before storage for whole blood-derived). However, comparison may be difficult due to the different size of apheresis versus pooled platelet units and the challenges of calculating the incidence per unit when multiple units are administered. Additional data are needed before a clear conclusion on relative risk of complications can be made. (See 'Dose' above.)
●Infection – Donor screening procedures and pathogen inactivation do not completely eliminate the risk of bacterial and other bloodborne infections, and infection by bacterially contaminated platelets represents a serious hazard of platelet transfusion. Platelets are stored at room temperature, where bacteria can proliferate rapidly [54,55]. Therefore, the incidence of bacterial contamination is higher for platelets than for red blood cells (RBC) (eg, approximately 1 in 2000 for platelets versus 1 in 30,000 for RBC) [56,57]. (See "Transfusion-transmitted bacterial infection".)
●Transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) – Transfusion of any blood product, including platelets, can lead to transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI), a form of acute lung injury that causes respiratory distress following transfusion. The true incidence of TRALI from platelet transfusion is unknown; it has decreased since institution of TRALI mitigation strategies in the late 2000s . (See "Transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI)", section on 'Epidemiology'.)
●Transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO) – Transfusion of any blood product may be associated with circulatory overload. Platelet transfusion introduces approximately 200 mL of intravascular volume per transfusion. The incidence of TACO is in the range of one to three per 100,000 transfusions and is higher in patients predisposed to volume overload (eg, with comorbidities such as congestive heart failure, renal failure, respiratory failure, and positive fluid balance). (See "Transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO)".)
●Alloimmunization – Platelets express Class I human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antigens, which can be recognized by the recipient's immune system as foreign. Production of anti-HLA antibodies can adversely affect the response to future platelet transfusions. The incidence of alloimmunization depends on the number of transfusions a patient has received. (See "Refractoriness to platelet transfusion therapy", section on 'Alloimmunization' and 'Platelet count increment' below.)
Platelet products also contain small volumes of RBCs, and alloimmunization to RBC antigens can occur as a result. This is especially of concern in Rh(D)-negative women of childbearing potential, who are at risk for hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) if they have an Rh(D)-positive pregnancy. As noted above, this is one of the settings in which it may be appropriate to use matched platelets and/or administer Rho(D) immune globulin. (See 'ABO, Rh, and HLA matching' above.)
●Allergic and anaphylactic reactions – Allergic reactions to platelet transfusion are relatively common. They are usually due to IgE directed against proteins in the donor plasma. Common symptoms include urticaria and pruritus in mild cases, and wheezing, shortness of breath and hypotension in more severe cases. (See "Immunologic blood transfusion reactions", section on 'Urticarial (allergic) reactions'.)
Patients with a history of allergic transfusion reactions who require additional platelet transfusions may benefit from platelets in additive solution (PAS), which contain less plasma than non-PAS platelets. Those who continue to have allergic reactions with PAS platelets may receive concentrated or washed platelets. (See 'Platelet additive solutions' above and 'Other special modifications' above.)
Anaphylactic reactions (ie, severe allergic reactions) are a very rare complication of platelet transfusion. These are associated with rapid onset of shock, angioedema, and respiratory distress. Many cases occur due to the production of anti IgA antibodies in recipients who are IgA deficient. (See "Immunologic blood transfusion reactions", section on 'Anaphylactic reactions'.)
●Febrile non-hemolytic transfusion reactions (FNHTR) – These reactions are mediated by various inflammatory mediators and leukocytes and may manifest as fevers, chills, and rigors. (See "Immunologic blood transfusion reactions", section on 'Febrile nonhemolytic reactions' and "Leukoreduction to prevent complications of blood transfusion", section on 'Febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions'.)
●Ta-GVHD – Transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease (ta-GVHD) can occur with any type of transfusion that contains lymphocytes, given the correct immunologic setting. Its incidence continues to drop due to irradiation of blood products for at-risk patients, such as patients with hematopoietic cell transplantation, immunodeficiency, or other types of immunosuppression.
A second and potentially less obvious situation that can lead to ta-GVHD in individuals who are completely immunocompetent is partial HLA matching (ie, a donor-recipient pair who are closely, but not completely, HLA matched, as can occur in relatives and genetically homogeneous populations) . In this case, the HLA antigens on the donor lymphocytes are seen by the recipient lymphocytes as self, so recipient lymphocytes do not attack the donor lymphocytes; however, recipient cells also express unique HLA antigens that the donor lymphocytes recognize as foreign. This can result in donor lymphocytes destroying the recipient's tissues (eg, bone marrow, skin and liver), which can be fatal. (See 'Irradiation' above and "Transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease", section on 'Summary and recommendations'.)
●Post-transfusion purpura – Post-transfusion purpura (PTP) is a rare transfusion reaction to any platelet-containing product, in which thrombocytopenia develops 5 to 10 days following transfusion. This can occur in the <2 percent of individuals who lack the platelet antigen PIA1, now known as human platelet antigen 1a (HPA-1a), and have become previously sensitized to the antigen (eg, during pregnancy or prior transfusion). Transfused platelets are removed by an antibody-mediated mechanism; the patient's own HPA-1a-negative platelets are also destroyed by an incompletely understood process. Treatment is with intravenous immune globulin (IVIG), with or without a glucocorticoid, and HPA-1a-negative products should be used whenever possible if platelet transfusion is indicated. (See "Immunologic blood transfusion reactions".)
PLATELET COUNT INCREMENT — Following a platelet transfusion, the platelet count should rise, with a peak at 10 minutes to one hour and a gradual decline over 72 hours. A general rule of thumb is that transfusion of six units of pooled platelets or one apheresis unit should increase the platelet count by approximately 30,000/microL in an adult of average size.
Platelet count increment is typically measured within 24 hours in patients given prophylactic platelet transfusions. For patients undergoing invasive procedures, it is prudent to check that the desired platelet count was achieved before performing the procedure, which can be done within 10 minutes of the transfusion. For actively bleeding patients, cessation of bleeding is a more important clinical endpoint than the post-transfusion platelet count.
The length of time platelets have been stored has a modest effect on their survival in the recipient. As an example, compared with platelets stored for two or three days, platelets stored for five days produce a smaller increment in platelet count. This information is not usually factored into assessment of a patient's response to platelet transfusion.
Many patients who receive platelet transfusions reproducibly show a less-than-expected increase in platelet count. The definition of platelet refractoriness and its management are discussed separately. (See "Refractoriness to platelet transfusion therapy", section on 'Diagnostic approach' and "Refractoriness to platelet transfusion therapy", section on 'Management of the alloimmunized patient'.)
ALTERNATIVES TO PLATELET TRANSFUSION — There are no substitutes for platelet transfusion to rapidly increase the platelet count in a bleeding patient. Reversal of thrombocytopenia due to autoimmune platelet destruction, platelet consumption, or bone marrow suppression can take days to weeks, depending on the underlying cause.
Patients with ongoing bleeding not responsive to platelet transfusion and other interventions can also be given procoagulant bypass agents, such as prothrombin complex concentrates or recombinant factor VIIa . (See "Platelet dysfunction in uremia", section on 'Desmopressin (dDAVP)' and "Medical management of the dialysis patient undergoing surgery", section on 'Bleeding diathesis'.)
In some settings, fibrinolytic inhibitors such as tranexamic acid have been effective. (See "Coagulopathy associated with trauma", section on 'Pharmaceutical hemostatic agents' and "Managing an episode of severe or prolonged uterine bleeding", section on 'Tranexamic acid'.)
Stimulation of bone marrow megakaryocytes with thrombopoietin receptor agonists can take up to seven days (ie, the time it takes for new platelets to form). This might be appropriate for selected indications for preventing bleeding. (See "Clinical applications of thrombopoietic growth factors", section on 'Use of TPO receptor agonists'.)
Investigational approaches to the use of platelet substitutes (eg, synthetic or acellular biological materials that could replace the primary hemostatic function of platelets) have not reached clinical trials [59,60].
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
●A unit of platelets isolated from a unit of donated blood contains approximately 7 x 1010 platelets, and four to six of these units are typically pooled for transfusion. Single donor (apheresis) platelets contain approximately 3 to 6 x 1011 platelets (ie, the equivalent of six or more units) per unit. Platelets are stored at room temperature; consequently their shelf life is only approximately five days. (See 'Platelet collection' above and 'Platelet storage and pathogen reduction' above.)
●Platelet transfusion can be lifesaving in bleeding patients with thrombocytopenia or reduced platelet function. Platelets should be transfused in any patient who is bleeding with a platelet count <50,000/microL (100,000/microL for central nervous system or ocular bleeding), or in any patient with an acquired or inherited platelet function defect regardless of platelet count. Platelet transfusion may also be indicated in thrombocytopenic patients undergoing invasive procedures, depending on the procedure and the platelet count. (See 'Actively bleeding patient' above and 'Preparation for an invasive procedure' above.)
●Other conditions that impair hemostasis (eg, coagulopathy, fever infection, anatomic defects) should be corrected in thrombocytopenic patients when possible to reduce active bleeding and to lessen the risk of spontaneous bleeding. (See 'Actively bleeding patient' above.)
●We use prophylactic platelet transfusion to prevent spontaneous bleeding in most afebrile patients with platelet counts below 10,000/microL due to bone marrow suppression. Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) have a coexisting coagulopathy, and we use a platelet transfusion threshold of 30,000 to 50,000/microL in these patients. We use higher thresholds in patients who are febrile or septic. (See 'Prevention of spontaneous bleeding' above and 'Therapeutic versus prophylactic transfusion' above and 'Specific clinical scenarios' above.)
●Patients with platelet consumption disorders, including immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), liver disease, as well as those with platelet function disorders, are typically transfused only for bleeding or, in some cases, invasive procedures. Platelets should not be withheld in bleeding patients with these conditions due to fear of “fueling the fire” of thrombosis. (See 'Specific clinical scenarios' above.)
●Platelet transfusion has risks, including sepsis, transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI), transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO), alloimmunization, allergic and anaphylactic transfusion reactions, febrile non-hemolytic transfusion reactions (FNHTR), transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease (ta-GVHD), and post-transfusion purpura (PTP). (See 'Complications of platelet transfusion' above.)
●Refractoriness to platelet transfusion is discussed separately. (See "Refractoriness to platelet transfusion therapy".)
●When ordering platelets, one should consider platelet dose; whether to use single donor versus random donor platelets; whether to include leukoreduction, irradiation, or platelets in platelet additive solution (PAS); whether CMV-negative platelets are required; and whether to match HLA, ABO, and Rh type. (See 'Ordering platelets' above.)
●There are limited alternatives to platelet transfusion for the acute treatment of thrombocytopenia-associated bleeding. Longer term alternatives include discontinuation of drugs that affect platelet function, treatment of underlying conditions, and other strategies to increase platelet production. (See 'Actively bleeding patient' above and 'Alternatives to platelet transfusion' above and 'Platelet function defects' above.)
- Slichter SJ. Platelet transfusion therapy. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2007; 21:697.
- McCullough J. Overview of platelet transfusion. Semin Hematol 2010; 47:235.
- Murphy S, Gardner FH. Effect of storage temperature on maintenance of platelet viability--deleterious effect of refrigerated storage. N Engl J Med 1969; 280:1094.
- Hoffmeister KM, Felbinger TW, Falet H, et al. The clearance mechanism of chilled blood platelets. Cell 2003; 112:87.
- Hoffmeister KM, Josefsson EC, Isaac NA, et al. Glycosylation restores survival of chilled blood platelets. Science 2003; 301:1531.
- Rumjantseva V, Grewal PK, Wandall HH, et al. Dual roles for hepatic lectin receptors in the clearance of chilled platelets. Nat Med 2009; 15:1273.
- Kumar A, Mhaskar R, Grossman BJ, et al. Platelet transfusion: a systematic review of the clinical evidence. Transfusion 2015; 55:1116.
- Nandagopal L, Veeraputhiran M, Jain T, et al. Bronchoscopy can be done safely in patients with thrombocytopenia. Transfusion 2016; 56:344.
- Zeidler K, Arn K, Senn O, et al. Optimal preprocedural platelet transfusion threshold for central venous catheter insertions in patients with thrombocytopenia. Transfusion 2011; 51:2269.
- Astwood E, Vora A. Personal practice: how we manage the risk of bleeding and thrombosis in children and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol 2011; 152:505.
- Vavricka SR, Walter RB, Irani S, et al. Safety of lumbar puncture for adults with acute leukemia and restrictive prophylactic platelet transfusion. Ann Hematol 2003; 82:570.
- van Veen JJ, Nokes TJ, Makris M. The risk of spinal haematoma following neuraxial anaesthesia or lumbar puncture in thrombocytopenic individuals. Br J Haematol 2010; 148:15.
- Avvisati G, Tirindelli MC, Annibali O. Thrombocytopenia and hemorrhagic risk in cancer patients. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2003; 48:S13.
- Slichter SJ, Kaufman RM, Assmann SF, et al. Dose of prophylactic platelet transfusions and prevention of hemorrhage. N Engl J Med 2010; 362:600.
- Josephson CD, Granger S, Assmann SF, et al. Bleeding risks are higher in children versus adults given prophylactic platelet transfusions for treatment-induced hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia. Blood 2012; 120:748.
- Estcourt LJ, Stanworth SJ, Murphy MF. Platelet transfusions for patients with haematological malignancies: who needs them? Br J Haematol 2011; 154:425.
- Stanworth SJ, Hyde C, Brunskill S, Murphy MF. Platelet transfusion prophylaxis for patients with haematological malignancies: where to now? Br J Haematol 2005; 131:588.
- Friedmann AM, Sengul H, Lehmann H, et al. Do basic laboratory tests or clinical observations predict bleeding in thrombocytopenic oncology patients? A reevaluation of prophylactic platelet transfusions. Transfus Med Rev 2002; 16:34.
- Buhrkuhl DC. An update on platelet transfusion in hematooncology supportive care. Transfusion 2010; 50:2266.
- Estcourt L, Stanworth S, Doree C, et al. Prophylactic platelet transfusion for prevention of bleeding in patients with haematological disorders after chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; :CD004269.
- Wandt H, Schaefer-Eckart K, Wendelin K, et al. Therapeutic platelet transfusion versus routine prophylactic transfusion in patients with haematological malignancies: an open-label, multicentre, randomised study. Lancet 2012; 380:1309.
- A Randomised Controlled Trial of Prophylactic Vs No-Prophylactic Platelet Transfusions in Patients with Haematological Malignancies (TOPPS: Trial Of Prophylactic PlateletS) http://public.ukcrn.org.uk/Search/StudyDetail.aspx?StudyID=3825 (Accessed on August 21, 2012).
- Stanworth SJ, Dyer C, Choo L, et al. Do all patients with hematologic malignancies and severe thrombocytopenia need prophylactic platelet transfusions? Background, rationale, and design of a clinical trial (trial of platelet prophylaxis) to assess the effectiveness of prophylactic platelet transfusions. Transfus Med Rev 2010; 24:163.
- Stanworth SJ, Estcourt LJ, Powter G, et al. A no-prophylaxis platelet-transfusion strategy for hematologic cancers. N Engl J Med 2013; 368:1771.
- Simon J. Stanworth, Lise Estcourt, Gillian Powter, et al. The Effect of a No-Prophylactic Versus Prophylactic Platelet Transfusion Strategy On Bleeding in Patients with Hematological Malignancies and Severe Thrombocytopenia (TOPPS trial). A Randomized Controlled, Non-Inferiority Trial. American Society of Hematology abstract book 2012; 120:1.
- Kaufman RM, Djulbegovic B, Gernsheimer T, et al. Platelet transfusion: a clinical practice guideline from the AABB. Ann Intern Med 2015; 162:205.
- Schiffer CA, Anderson KC, Bennett CL, et al. Platelet transfusion for patients with cancer: clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19:1519.
- Goel R, Ness PM, Takemoto CM, et al. Platelet transfusions in platelet consumptive disorders are associated with arterial thrombosis and in-hospital mortality. Blood 2015; 125:1470.
- Swisher KK, Terrell DR, Vesely SK, et al. Clinical outcomes after platelet transfusions in patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Transfusion 2009; 49:873.
- Hopkins CK, Goldfinger D. Platelet transfusions in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a report of four cases and review of the literature. Transfusion 2008; 48:2128.
- Baharoglu MI, Cordonnier C, Al-Shahi Salman R, et al. Platelet transfusion versus standard care after acute stroke due to spontaneous cerebral haemorrhage associated with antiplatelet therapy (PATCH): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2016; 387:2605.
- Sarode R. How do I transfuse platelets (PLTs) to reverse anti-PLT drug effect? Transfusion 2012; 52:695.
- Pandit TN, Sarode R. Blood component support in acquired coagulopathic conditions: is there a method to the madness? Am J Hematol 2012; 87 Suppl 1:S56.
- Heddle NM, Cook RJ, Tinmouth A, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing standard- and low-dose strategies for transfusion of platelets (SToP) to patients with thrombocytopenia. Blood 2009; 113:1564.
- Slichter SJ. Evidence-based platelet transfusion guidelines. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2007; :172.
- Fast LD. Developments in the prevention of transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease. Br J Haematol 2012; 158:563.
- Rock G, Adams GA, Labow RS. The effects of irradiation on platelet function. Transfusion 1988; 28:451.
- Przepiorka D, LeParc GF, Stovall MA, et al. Use of irradiated blood components: practice parameter. Am J Clin Pathol 1996; 106:6.
- Webb IJ. Transfusion-associated graft-vs-host disease. In: Transfusion reactions, 3rd, Popovsky MA. (Ed), American Association of Blood Banks Press, Bethesda, MD 2007. p.237.
- AABB Technical Manual, 17th, Roback JD, Grossman BJ, Harris T, et al. (Eds), American Association of Blood Banks Press, Bethesda, MD 2011. p.237.
- King KE, Ness PM. How do we prevent transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease in children? Transfusion 2011; 51:916.
- Josephson CD, Mullis NC, Van Demark C, Hillyer CD. Significant numbers of apheresis-derived group O platelet units have "high-titer" anti-A/A,B: implications for transfusion policy. Transfusion 2004; 44:805.
- Goldfinger D, McGinniss MH. Rh-incompatible platelet transfusions--risks and consequences of sensitizing immunosuppressed patients. N Engl J Med 1971; 284:942.
- http://obgyan2015.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Rh-negative-and-AntiD.pdf (Accessed on February 24, 2016).
- Cid J, Carbassé G, Pereira A, et al. Platelet transfusions from D+ donors to D- patients: a 10-year follow-up study of 1014 patients. Transfusion 2011; 51:1163.
- Atoyebi W, Mundy N, Croxton T, et al. Is it necessary to administer anti-D to prevent RhD immunization after the transfusion of RhD-positive platelet concentrates? Br J Haematol 2000; 111:980.
- Capocelli KE, Dumont LJ. Novel platelet storage conditions: additive solutions, gas, and cold. Curr Opin Hematol 2014; 21:491.
- Tobian AA, Fuller AK, Uglik K, et al. The impact of platelet additive solution apheresis platelets on allergic transfusion reactions and corrected count increment (CME). Transfusion 2014; 54:1523.
- Kerkhoffs JL, Eikenboom JC, Schipperus MS, et al. A multicenter randomized study of the efficacy of transfusions with platelets stored in platelet additive solution II versus plasma. Blood 2006; 108:3210.
- de Wildt-Eggen J, Nauta S, Schrijver JG, et al. Reactions and platelet increments after transfusion of platelet concentrates in plasma or an additive solution: a prospective, randomized study. Transfusion 2000; 40:398.
- Heddle NM, Arnold DM, Boye D, et al. Comparing the efficacy and safety of apheresis and whole blood-derived platelet transfusions: a systematic review. Transfusion 2008; 48:1447.
- Daurat A, Roger C, Gris J, et al. Apheresis platelets are more frequently associated with adverse reactions than pooled platelets both in recipients and in donors: a study from French hemovigilance data. Transfusion 2016; 56:1295.
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration. Workshop on bacterial contamination of platelets. Bethesda, MD: Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research; 1999. www.fda.gov/cber/minutes/workshop-min.htm (Accessed on November 15, 2012).
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Fatal bacterial infections associated with platelet transfusions--United States, 2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2005; 54:168.
- Kleinman S, Reed W, Stassinopoulos A. A patient-oriented risk-benefit analysis of pathogen-inactivated blood components: application to apheresis platelets in the United States. Transfusion 2013; 53:1603.
- Jacobs MR, Smith D, Heaton WA, et al. Detection of bacterial contamination in prestorage culture-negative apheresis platelets on day of issue with the Pan Genera Detection test. Transfusion 2011; 51:2573.
- Blumberg N, Heal JM, Gettings KF, et al. An association between decreased cardiopulmonary complications (transfusion-related acute lung injury and transfusion-associated circulatory overload) and implementation of universal leukoreduction of blood transfusions. Transfusion 2010; 50:2738.
- Kim HW, Greenburg AG. Toward 21st century blood component replacement therapeutics: artificial oxygen carriers, platelet substitutes, recombinant clotting factors, and others. Artif Cells Blood Substit Immobil Biotechnol 2006; 34:537.
- Okamura Y, Katsuno S, Suzuki H, et al. Release abilities of adenosine diphosphate from phospholipid vesicles with different membrane properties and their hemostatic effects as a platelet substitute. J Control Release 2010; 148:373.