Medline ® Abstracts for References 5,23

A number of presentations of chronic demyelinating polyneuropathy have been identified, each distinguished by its phenotypic pattern. In addition to classic chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), which is characterized clinically by symmetric proximal and distal weakness and sensory loss, several regional variants can be recognized: multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN: asymmetric and pure motor), multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor (MADSAM) neuropathy (asymmetric, sensory, and motor), and distal acquired demyelinating symmetric (DADS) neuropathy (symmetric, distal, sensory, and motor). There are also temporal, pathological, and disease-associated variants. This review describes a clinical scheme for approaching the chronic acquired demyelinating polyneuropathies that leads to a rational use of supportive laboratory studies and treatment options. In addition, we propose new diagnostic criteria for CIDP that more accurately reflect current clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize an acquired, symmetric, demyelinating neuropathic variant with distal sensory or sensorimotor features.

BACKGROUND: Classic chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) patients have prominent proximal and distal weakness. However, chronic demyelinating neuropathies may present with different phenotypes. An approach that distinguishes these disorders primarily according to the pattern of weakness may be useful to the clinician.

METHODS: A total of 53 patients with acquired symmetric demyelinating polyneuropathies were classified primarily according to the pattern of the neuropathy and secondarily according to the presence and type of monoclonal protein (M-protein) in this retrospective review. The authors distinguished between patients with distal sensory or sensorimotor involvement, designated as distal acquired demyelinating symmetric (DADS) neuropathy, from those with proximal and distal weakness, who were designated as CIDP.

RESULTS: M-proteins were present in 22% of patients with CIDP. There were no features that distinguished clearly between CIDP patients with or without an M-protein, and nearly all of these patients responded to immunomodulating therapy. In contrast, nearly two-thirds of the patients with DADS neuropathy had immunoglobulin M (IgM) kappa monoclonal gammopathies, and this specific combination predicted a poor response to immunomodulating therapy. Antimyelin-associated glycoprotein (anti-MAG) antibodies were present in 67% of these patients.

CONCLUSION: Distinguishing acquired demyelinating neuropathies by phenotype can often predict the presence of IgM kappa M-proteins, anti-MAG antibodies, and responses to immunomodulating therapy.