UpToDate
Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2017 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Medline ® Abstracts for References 110-112

of 'Chronic functional constipation and fecal incontinence in infants and children: Treatment'

110
TI
Biofeedback treatment for chronic constipation and encopresis in childhood: long-term outcome.
AU
Loening-Baucke V
SO
Pediatrics. 1995;96(1 Pt 1):105.
 
OBJECTIVE: Abnormal defecation dynamics often are present in children with chronic constipation and encopresis. Patients who learned normal defecation dynamics with biofeedback treatment had improved short-term outcome. The aim of our research was to evaluate if biofeedback treatment improved long-term outcome.
DESIGN: One hundred twenty-nine children with constipation, encopresis, and abnormal defecation dynamics were treated conventionally; 63 of them received additional biofeedback training directed towards teaching normal defecation dynamics.
RESULTS: At follow-up (4.1 +/- 1.5 years), 86% of conventionally treated patients and 87% of biofeedback-treated patients had improvement in encopresis; 62% of conventionally treated patients, 50% of successful biofeedback-treated patients, and 23% of unsuccessful biofeedback-treated patients had recovered from chronic constipation and encopresis. Recovery rates were similar for conventionally treated patients and biofeedback-treated patients who learned normal defecation dynamics (P>.2) but significantly lower for unsuccessful biofeedback-treated patients (P<.02). Length of follow-up was significantly related to recovery (P<.01).
CONCLUSION: Learning normal defecation dynamics with biofeedback training did not increase long-term recovery rates in children with chronic constipation, encopresis, and abnormal defecation dynamics above those achieved with conventional treatment alone.
AD
University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.
PMID
111
TI
Biofeedback training in treatment of childhood constipation: a randomised controlled study.
AU
van der Plas RN, Benninga MA, Büller HA, Bossuyt PM, Akkermans LM, Redekop WK, Taminiau JA
SO
Lancet. 1996;348(9030):776.
 
BACKGROUND: Because abnormal defaecation dynamics, which can be modified by biofeedback, are considered to be the underlying problem in constipation, biofeedback training may be a useful treatment for constipation. This treatment has mainly been studied in uncontrolled trials. We evaluated defaecation dynamics and clinical outcome in chronically constipated children in a randomised study comparing conventional treatment and conventional treatment with biofeedback training.
METHODS: Patients, 5 to 16 years old, were referred to the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam by general practitioners, school doctors, paediatricians, and psychiatrists. They had to fulfil at least two of four criteria for paediatric constipation and were included if they had been treated medically for at least one month before randomisation. Patients had a medical history, abdominal and rectal examination, and anorectal manometry at the start and end of the 6-week intervention period. The conventional group received laxative treatment with additional dietary advice, toilet training, and maintenance of a diary of bowel habits. The biofeedback group received the same conventional treatment and additionally five biofeedback training sessions. During the first 3 weeks, patients visited the outpatient clinic weekly; two subsequent visits were twice monthly.
FINDINGS: 94 patients were randomised to conventional treatment (CT) and 98 to conventional treatment with additional biofeedback training (CT+BF). Normal defaecation dynamics increased in the CT group from 41% to 52% (not significant) and in the CT+BF group from 38% to 86% (p = 0.001). At 6 weeks, more patients in the CT+BF group showed normal defaecation dynamics, compared to the CT group (p<0.001). This result was unaltered by controlling for baseline status in a logistic regression model. At 1 year, successful treatment (defaecation frequency>or = 3/week, soiling and/or encopresis<2/month, and no laxatives) was accomplished in 59% of the CT and 50% of the CT+BF group (p = 0.24). The results were maintained after 1 1/2 years follow-up. No association was found between achievement of normal defaecation dynamics and clinical outcome.
INTERPRETATION: Additional biofeedback training compared to conventional therapy did not result in higher success rates in chronically constipated children. Furthermore, achievement of normal defaecation dynamics was not associated with success: abnormal defaecation dynamics seem not to play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of childhood constipation. Intensive conventional laxative treatment should remain the first choice in chronically constipated children.
AD
Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
PMID
112
TI
Randomised trial of biofeedback training for encopresis.
AU
van der Plas RN, Benninga MA, Redekop WK, Taminiau JA, Büller HA
SO
Arch Dis Child. 1996;75(5):367.
 
AIMS: To evaluate biofeedback training in children with encopresis and the effect on psychosocial function.
DESIGN: Prospective controlled randomised study. PATIENT INTERVENTIONS: A multimodal treatment of six weeks. Children were randomised into two groups. Each group received dietary and toilet advice, enemas, oral laxatives, and anorectal manometry. One group also received five biofeedback training sessions.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Successful treatment was defined as less than two episodes of encopresis, regular bowel movements, and no laxatives. Psychosocial function after treatment was assessed using the Child Behaviour Checklist.
RESULTS: Children given laxatives and biofeedback training had higher success rates than those who received laxatives alone (39% v 19%) at the end of the intervention period. At 12 and 18 months, however, approximately 50% of children in each group were successfully treated. Abnormal behaviour scores were initially observed in 35% of children. Most children had improved behaviour scores six months after treatment. Children with an initial abnormal behaviour score who were successfully treated had a significant improvement in their behavioural profiles.
CONCLUSIONS: Biofeedback training had no additional effect on the success rate or behaviour scores. Psychosocial problems are present in a subgroup of children with encopresis. The relation between successful treatment and improvement in behavioural function supports the idea that encopresis has an aetiological role in the occurrence and maintenance of behavioural problems in children with encopresis.
AD
Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
PMID