Chorionic villus sampling: Risks, complications, and techniques

INTRODUCTION

Chorionic villus sampling (CVS) refers to a procedure for the prenatal diagnosis of genetic disorders in which small samples of the placenta are obtained for chromosome or DNA analysis. It is generally performed during the first trimester (after 10 weeks), thus reducing the at-risk couple's period of anxious waiting for test results and permitting access to pregnancy termination at a safer and more discreet time. A larger amount of DNA is derived from CVS than from cells obtained at amniocentesis, thereby allowing reliable DNA analysis within hours or days of sampling. (See "Diagnostic amniocentesis".)

Introduction of first trimester screening programs has led to a decrease in the utilization of CVS, particularly among women 35 years or older [1-3]. (See "First trimester combined test and integrated tests for screening for Down syndrome and trisomy 18" and "Prenatal diagnosis using cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood".)

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

CVS is performed as an ambulatory procedure, without analgesia or local anesthesia [4]. A transvaginal sonographic examination should precede the procedure to determine the number of embryos and chorionicity, document fetal viability, and detect major fetal structural anomalies.

Personnel — The sonographer and the physician performing the CVS should be coordinated with one another. Coordination comes from experience; a learning curve for safe and successful performance of the procedure has been described [5]. An assistant trained in the sonographic appearance of a transcervical catheter or transabdominal needle is also essential to ensure smooth performance. A second trained assistant with an on-site microscope can provide rapid evaluation of sample adequacy, assess the quality of the specimen obtained, and select the chorionic villi.

Technique — Two approaches are available for obtaining chorionic tissue: transcervical (TC) and transabdominal (TA).

                        

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Mar 2014. | This topic last updated: Jan 6, 2014.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2014 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Benn PA, Egan JF, Fang M, Smith-Bindman R. Changes in the utilization of prenatal diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103:1255.
  2. Chasen ST, McCullough LB, Chervenak FA. Is nuchal translucency screening associated with different rates of invasive testing in an older obstetric population? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190:769.
  3. Wray AM, Ghidini A, Alvis C, et al. The impact of first-trimester screening on AMA patients' uptake of invasive testing. Prenat Diagn 2005; 25:350.
  4. Mujezinovic F, Alfirevic Z. Analgesia for amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; :CD008580.
  5. Wijnberger LD, van der Schouw YT, Christiaens GC. Learning in medicine: chorionic villus sampling. Prenat Diagn 2000; 20:241.
  6. Young C, von Dadelszen P, Alfirevic Z. Instruments for chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 1:CD000114.
  7. von Dadelszen P, Sermer M, Hillier J, et al. A randomised controlled trial of biopsy forceps and cannula aspiration for transcervical chorionic villus sampling. BJOG 2005; 112:559.
  8. Battagliarin G, Lanna M, Coviello D, et al. A randomized study to assess two different techniques of aspiration while performing transabdominal chorionic villus sampling. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33:169.
  9. Brown L, Abigania M, Warburton D, Brown S. Validation of QF-PCR for prenatal aneuploidy screening in the United States. Prenat Diagn 2006; 26:1068.
  10. Pergament E, Schulman JD, Copeland K, et al. The risk and efficacy of chorionic villus sampling in multiple gestations. Prenat Diagn 1992; 12:377.
  11. Wapner RJ, Johnson A, Davis G, et al. Prenatal diagnosis in twin gestations: a comparison between second-trimester amniocentesis and first-trimester chorionic villus sampling. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82:49.
  12. Smidt-Jensen S, Permin M, Philip J, et al. Randomised comparison of amniocentesis and transabdominal and transcervical chorionic villus sampling. Lancet 1992; 340:1237.
  13. Los FJ, van den Berg C, Van Opstal D, et al. Abnormal karyotypes in semi-direct chorionic villus preparations of women with different cytogenetic risks. Prenat Diagn 1998; 18:1023.
  14. Hahnemann JM, Vejerslev LO. Accuracy of cytogenetic findings on chorionic villus sampling (CVS)--diagnostic consequences of CVS mosaicism and non-mosaic discrepancy in centres contributing to EUCROMIC 1986-1992. Prenat Diagn 1997; 17:801.
  15. van den Berg C, Van Opstal D, Brandenburg H, et al. Accuracy of abnormal karyotypes after the analysis of both short- and long-term culture of chorionic villi. Prenat Diagn 2000; 20:956.
  16. Moise KJ Jr, Carpenter RJ Jr. Increased severity of fetal hemolytic disease with known rhesus alloimmunization after first-trimester transcervical chorionic villus biopsy. Fetal Diagn Ther 1990; 5:76.
  17. Mujezinovic F, Alfirevic Z. Procedure-related complications of amniocentesis and chorionic villous sampling: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110:687.
  18. Medical Research Council European trial of chorion villus sampling. MRC working party on the evaluation pf chorion villus sampling. Lancet 1991; 337:1491.
  19. Lippman A, Tomkins DJ, Shime J, Hamerton JL. Canadian multicentre randomized clinical trial of chorion villus sampling and amniocentesis. Final report. Prenat Diagn 1992; 12:385.
  20. Borrell A, Fortuny A, Lazaro L, et al. First-trimester transcervical chorionic villus sampling by biopsy forceps versus mid-trimester amniocentesis: a randomized controlled trial project. Prenat Diagn 1999; 19:1138.
  21. Jackson LG, Zachary JM, Fowler SE, et al. A randomized comparison of transcervical and transabdominal chorionic-villus sampling. The U.S. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Chorionic-Villus Sampling and Amniocentesis Study Group. N Engl J Med 1992; 327:594.
  22. Brambati B, Terzian E, Tognoni G. Randomized clinical trial of transabdominal versus transcervical chorionic villus sampling methods. Prenat Diagn 1991; 11:285.
  23. Papp C, Beke A, Mezei G, et al. Chorionic villus sampling: a 15-year experience. Fetal Diagn Ther 2002; 17:218.
  24. Scott F, Peters H, Boogert T, et al. The loss rates for invasive prenatal testing in a specialised obstetric ultrasound practice. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 42:55.
  25. Alfirevic Z, Sundberg K, Brigham S. Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; :CD003252.
  26. Silver RK, MacGregor SN, Sholl JS, et al. An evaluation of the chorionic villus sampling learning curve. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163:917.
  27. Kuliev A, Jackson L, Froster U, et al. Chorionic villus sampling safety. Report of World Health Organization/EURO meeting in association with the Seventh International Conference on Early Prenatal Diagnosis of Genetic Diseases, Tel-Aviv, Israel, May 21, 1994. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174:807.
  28. Caughey AB, Hopkins LM, Norton ME. Chorionic villus sampling compared with amniocentesis and the difference in the rate of pregnancy loss. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108:612.
  29. Agarwal K, Alfirevic Z. Pregnancy loss after chorionic villus sampling and genetic amniocentesis in twin pregnancies: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 40:128.
  30. De Catte L, Liebaers I, Foulon W. Outcome of twin gestations after first trimester chorionic villus sampling. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96:714.
  31. Eddleman KA, Stone JL, Lynch L, Berkowitz RL. Chorionic villus sampling before multifetal pregnancy reduction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183:1078.
  32. Sikkema-Raddatz B, Bouman K, Verschuuren-Bemelmans CC, et al. Four years' cytogenetic experience with the culture of chorionic villi. Prenat Diagn 2000; 20:950.
  33. Stetten G, Escallon CS, South ST, et al. Reevaluating confined placental mosaicism. Am J Med Genet A 2004; 131:232.
  34. Carroll SG, Davies T, Kyle PM, et al. Fetal karyotyping by chorionic villus sampling after the first trimester. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106:1035.
  35. Wilkins-Haug L, Quade B, Morton CC. Confined placental mosaicism as a risk factor among newborns with fetal growth restriction. Prenat Diagn 2006; 26:428.
  36. van den Berg C, Van Opstal D, Polak-Knook J, Galjaard RJ. (Potential) false-negative diagnoses in chorionic villi and a review of the literature. Prenat Diagn 2006; 26:401.
  37. Los FJ, van Den Berg C, Wildschut HI, et al. The diagnostic performance of cytogenetic investigation in amniotic fluid cells and chorionic villi. Prenat Diagn 2001; 21:1150.
  38. Toutain J, Labeau-Gaüzere C, Barnetche T, et al. Confined placental mosaicism and pregnancy outcome: a distinction needs to be made between types 2 and 3. Prenat Diagn 2010; 30:1155.
  39. Van Opstal D, Van den Berg C, Deelen WH, et al. Prospective prenatal investigations on potential uniparental disomy in cases of confined placental trisomy. Prenat Diagn 1998; 18:35.
  40. Mastroiacovo P, Botto LD, Cavalcanti DP, et al. Limb anomalies following chorionic villus sampling: a registry based case-control study. Am J Med Genet 1992; 44:856.
  41. Dolk H, Bertrand F, Lechat MF. Chorionic villus sampling and limb abnormalities. The EUROCAT Working Group. Lancet 1992; 339:876.
  42. Report of National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Workshop on Chorionic Villus Sampling and Limb and Other Defects, October 20, 1992. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169:1.
  43. Olney RS, Khoury MJ, Alo CJ, et al. Increased risk for transverse digital deficiency after chorionic villus sampling: results of the United States Multistate Case-Control Study, 1988-1992. Teratology 1995; 51:20.
  44. Firth H. Chorion villus sampling and limb deficiency--cause or coincidence? Prenat Diagn 1997; 17:1313.
  45. Firth HV, Boyd PA, Chamberlain PF, et al. Analysis of limb reduction defects in babies exposed to chorionic villus sampling. Lancet 1994; 343:1069.
  46. Katiyar R, Kriplani A, Agarwal N, et al. Detection of fetomaternal hemorrhage following chorionic villus sampling by Kleihauer Betke test and rise in maternal serum alpha feto protein. Prenat Diagn 2007; 27:139.
  47. Smidt-Jensen S, Philip J, Zachary JM, et al. Implications of maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein elevation caused by transabdominal and transcervical CVS. Prenat Diagn 1994; 14:35.
  48. Cederholm M, Haglund B, Axelsson O. Maternal complications following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal karyotyping. BJOG 2003; 110:392.
  49. Minna T, Mika G, Tiina L, et al. Risk for placental abruption following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31:410.
  50. Silver RK, Wilson RD, Philip J, et al. Late first-trimester placental disruption and subsequent gestational hypertension/preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105:587.
  51. Adusumalli J, Han CS, Beckham S, et al. Chorionic villus sampling and risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196:591.e1.
  52. Grobman WA, Auger M, Shulman LP, Elias S. The association between chorionic villus sampling and preeclampsia. Prenat Diagn 2009; 29:800.
  53. Odibo AO, Singla A, Gray DL, et al. Is chorionic villus sampling associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy? Prenat Diagn 2010; 30:9.
  54. Khalil A, Akolekar R, Pandya P, et al. Chorionic villus sampling at 11 to 13 weeks of gestation and hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116:374.
  55. Schaap AH, van der Pol HG, Boer K, et al. Long-term follow-up of infants after transcervical chorionic villus sampling and after amniocentesis to compare congenital abnormalities and health status. Prenat Diagn 2002; 22:598.
  56. Cederholm M, Haglund B, Axelsson O. Infant morbidity following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal karyotyping. BJOG 2005; 112:394.