Smarter Decisions,
Better Care

UpToDate synthesizes the most recent medical information into evidence-based practical recommendations clinicians trust to make the right point-of-care decisions.

  • Rigorous editorial process: Evidence-based treatment recommendations
  • World-Renowned physician authors: over 5,100 physician authors and editors around the globe
  • Innovative technology: integrates into the workflow; access from EMRs

Choose from the list below to learn more about subscriptions for a:


Subscribers log in here


Chapter 4B: Countercurrent mechanism

INTRODUCTION

Fluid leaving the proximal tubule is isosmotic to plasma. However, the excretion of an isosmotic urine is usually not adequate to meet the homeostatic requirements of the body. After a water load, for example, water must be excreted in excess of solute. This requires the excretion of urine that is hypoosmotic to plasma. Conversely, water must be retained and a hyperosmotic urine excreted after a period of water restriction. The formation of a dilute (hypoosmotic to plasma) or concentrated (hyperosmotic to plasma) urine is achieved via the countercurrent mechanism, which includes the loops of Henle, the cortical and medullary collecting tubules, and the blood supply to these segments.

Before discussing these processes in detail, it is useful to summarize their basic aspects. The excretion of a concentrated urine involves two major steps:

The medullary interstitium is made hyperosmotic by the reabsorption of NaCl without water in the medullary ascending limb of the loop of Henle. Urea entry into the interstitium from the medullary collecting tubule also contributes to this process.

As the urine enters the medullary collecting tubule, it equilibrates osmotically with the interstitium, resulting in the formation of a concentrated urine. Antidiuretic hormone (ADH), released from the posterior pituitary, plays an essential role in this process by increasing collecting tubule permeability to water, which is very low in the basal state. ADH appears to act by inserting aquaporin-2 water channels into the luminal membrane, thereby allowing transcellular water reabsorption to occur down an osmotic gradient.

In addition, two modifying factors are important for the maintenance of medullary hyperosmolality:

        

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Nov 2014. | This topic last updated: Oct 10, 2003.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2014 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Jamison RL, Maffly RH. The urinary concentrating mechanism. N Engl J Med 1976; 295:1059.
  2. Sands JM, Kokko JP. Current concepts of the countercurrent multiplication system. Kidney Int Suppl 1996; 57:S93.
  3. Wexler AS, Kalaba RE, Marsh DJ. Three-dimensional anatomy and renal concentrating mechanism. II. Sensitivity results. Am J Physiol 1991; 260:F384.
  4. Chou CL, Nielsen S, Knepper MA. Structural-functional correlation in chinchilla long loop of Henle thin limbs: a novel papillary subsegment. Am J Physiol 1993; 265:F863.
  5. Nielsen S, Pallone T, Smith BL, et al. Aquaporin-1 water channels in short and long loop descending thin limbs and in descending vasa recta in rat kidney. Am J Physiol 1995; 268:F1023.
  6. Chou CL, Knepper MA, Hoek AN, et al. Reduced water permeability and altered ultrastructure in thin descending limb of Henle in aquaporin-1 null mice. J Clin Invest 1999; 103:491.
  7. Nielsen S, Kwon TH, Christensen BM, et al. Physiology and pathophysiology of renal aquaporins. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999; 10:647.
  8. Molony DA, Reeves WB, Andreoli TE. Na+:K+:2Cl- cotransport and the thick ascending limb. Kidney Int 1989; 36:418.
  9. Molony DA, Reeves WB, Hebert SC, Andreoli TE. ADH increases apical Na+, K+, 2Cl- entry in mouse medullary thick ascending limbs of Henle. Am J Physiol 1987; 252:F177.
  10. Kim GH, Ecelbarger CA, Mitchell C, et al. Vasopressin increases Na-K-2Cl cotransporter expression in thick ascending limb of Henle's loop. Am J Physiol 1999; 276:F96.
  11. Morel F, Imbert-Teboul M, Chabardès D. Receptors to vasopressin and other hormones in the mammalian kidney. Kidney Int 1987; 31:512.
  12. Greger R, Velázquez H. The cortical thick ascending limb and early distal convoluted tubule in the urinary concentrating mechanism. Kidney Int 1987; 31:590.
  13. Sands JM, Nonoguchi H, Knepper MA. Vasopressin effects on urea and H2O transport in inner medullary collecting duct subsegments. Am J Physiol 1987; 253:F823.
  14. Kokko JP. The role of the collecting duct in urinary concentration. Kidney Int 1987; 31:606.
  15. Deen PM, Verdijk MA, Knoers NV, et al. Requirement of human renal water channel aquaporin-2 for vasopressin-dependent concentration of urine. Science 1994; 264:92.
  16. GOTTSCHALK CW, MYLLE M. Micropuncture study of the mammalian urinary concentrating mechanism: evidence for the countercurrent hypothesis. Am J Physiol 1959; 196:927.
  17. Woodhall PB, Tisher CC. Response of the distal tubule and cortical collecting duct to vasopressin in the rat. J Clin Invest 1973; 52:3095.
  18. Imai M. The connecting tubule: a functional subdivision of the rabbit distal nephron segments. Kidney Int 1979; 15:346.
  19. Knepper MA, Roch-Ramel F. Pathways of urea transport in the mammalian kidney. Kidney Int 1987; 31:629.
  20. You G, Smith CP, Kanai Y, et al. Cloning and characterization of the vasopressin-regulated urea transporter. Nature 1993; 365:844.
  21. Shayakul C, Steel A, Hediger MA. Molecular cloning and characterization of the vasopressin-regulated urea transporter of rat kidney collecting ducts. J Clin Invest 1996; 98:2580.
  22. Knepper MA, Star RA. The vasopressin-regulated urea transporter in renal inner medullary collecting duct. Am J Physiol 1990; 259:F393.
  23. Nielsen S, Knepper MA. Vasopressin activates collecting duct urea transporters and water channels by distinct physical processes. Am J Physiol 1993; 265:F204.
  24. Terris JM, Knepper MA, Wade JB. UT-A3: localization and characterization of an additional urea transporter isoform in the IMCD. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2001; 280:F325.
  25. Sands JM, Schrader DC. An independent effect of osmolality on urea transport in rat terminal inner medullary collecting ducts. J Clin Invest 1991; 88:137.
  26. Bagnasco SM. Gene structure of urea transporters. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2003; 284:F3.
  27. LASSITER WE, MYLLE M, GOTTSCHALK CW. NET TRANSTUBULAR MOVEMENT OF WATER AND UREA IN SALINE DIURESIS. Am J Physiol 1964; 206:669.
  28. LEVITIN H, GOODMAN A, PIGEON G, EPSTEIN FH. Composition of the renal medulla during water diuresis. J Clin Invest 1962; 41:1145.
  29. Harrington AR, Valtin H. Impaired urinary concentration after vasopressin and its gradual correction in hypothalamic diabetes insipidus. J Clin Invest 1968; 47:502.
  30. Miller M, Dalakos T, Moses AM, et al. Recognition of partial defects in antidiuretic hormone secretion. Ann Intern Med 1970; 73:721.
  31. EPSTEIN FH, KLEEMAN CR, HENDRIKX A. The influence of bodily hydration on the renal concentrating process. J Clin Invest 1957; 36:629.
  32. Kondo Y, Abe K, Igarashi Y, et al. Direct evidence for the absence of active Na+ reabsorption in hamster ascending thin limb of Henle's loop. J Clin Invest 1993; 91:5.
  33. Stephenson JL, Zhang Y, Tewarson R. Electrolyte, urea, and water transport in a two-nephron central core model of the renal medulla. Am J Physiol 1989; 257:F399.
  34. Koyama S, Yoshitomi K, Imai M. Effect of protamine on ion conductance of ascending thin limb of Henle's loop from hamsters. Am J Physiol 1991; 261:F593.
  35. Matsumura Y, Uchida S, Kondo Y, et al. Overt nephrogenic diabetes insipidus in mice lacking the CLC-K1 chloride channel. Nat Genet 1999; 21:95.
  36. Knepper MA, Saidel GM, Hascall VC, Dwyer T. Concentration of solutes in the renal inner medulla: interstitial hyaluronan as a mechano-osmotic transducer. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2003; 284:F433.
  37. Devuyst O, Guggino WB. Chloride channels in the kidney: lessons learned from knockout animals. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2002; 283:F1176.
  38. Zimmerhackl BL, Robertson CR, Jamison RL. The medullary microcirculation. Kidney Int 1987; 31:641.
  39. Sanjana VM, Johnston PA, Deen WM, et al. Hydraulic and oncotic pressure measurements in inner medulla of mammalian kidney. Am J Physiol 1975; 228:1921.
  40. Pallone TL, Zhang Z, Rhinehart K. Physiology of the renal medullary microcirculation. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2003; 284:F253.
  41. Zimmerhackl B, Robertson CR, Jamison RL. Fluid uptake in the renal papilla by vasa recta estimated by two methods simultaneously. Am J Physiol 1985; 248:F347.
  42. Pallone TL, Edwards A, Ma T, et al. Requirement of aquaporin-1 for NaCl-driven water transport across descending vasa recta. J Clin Invest 2000; 105:215.
  43. Pallone TL. Effect of sodium chloride gradients on water flux in rat descending vasa recta. J Clin Invest 1991; 87:12.
  44. Chou SY, Porush JG, Faubert PF. Renal medullary circulation: hormonal control. Kidney Int 1990; 37:1.
  45. THURAU K. RENAL HEMODYNAMICS. Am J Med 1964; 36:698.
  46. Goldberg M, Ramirez MA. Effects of saline and mannitol diuresis on the renal concentrating mechanism in dogs: alterations in renal tissue solutes and water. Clin Sci 1967; 32:475.
  47. Seely JF, Dirks JH. Micropuncture study of hypertonic mannitol diuresis in the proximal and distal tubule of the dog kidney. J Clin Invest 1969; 48:2330.
  48. BERLINER RW, DAVIDSON DG. Production of hypertonic urine in the absence of pituitary antidiuretic hormone. J Clin Invest 1957; 36:1416.
  49. Valtin H, Edwards BR. GFR and the concentration of urine in the absence of vasopressin. Berliner-Davidson re-explored. Kidney Int 1987; 31:634.