Care of the uncircumcised penis
- Duncan Wilcox, MD
Duncan Wilcox, MD
- Section Editor — Pediatric Urology
- Professor of Urology, The Ponzio Family Chair in Pediatric Urology
- University of Colorado
- Section Editors
- Laurence S Baskin, MD, FAAP
Laurence S Baskin, MD, FAAP
- Section Editor — Pediatric Urology
- Frank Hinman, Jr., MD, Distinguished Professorship in Pediatric Urology
- Chief Pediatric Urology
- Professor of Urology and Pediatrics
- UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital
- Jan E Drutz, MD
Jan E Drutz, MD
- Section Editor — General Pediatrics
- Professor of Pediatrics
- Baylor College of Medicine
In most parts of the world, male circumcision, the elective surgical removal of the skin covering the end of the penis (ie, prepuce or foreskin), is uncommon.
The care and complications of the uncircumcised penis will be reviewed here. The procedures, risks, benefits, and complications of circumcision are discussed separately. (See "Techniques for neonatal circumcision" and "Neonatal circumcision: Risks and benefits" and "Complications of circumcision".)
NORMAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE FORESKIN
The normal foreskin begins to develop as an epithelial fold that grows inward from the base of the glans penis at eight to nine weeks gestation with normal completion by 4 to 4.5 months gestation. The squamous epithelial lining of the inner prepuce is contiguous with the glans penis, resulting in the normal circumferentially initial adhesions between the inner layer of the prepuce and the glabrous epithelium of the glans penis.
Separation of the foreskin from the glans penis occurs by desquamation and begins late in gestation, but remains incomplete in most male infants at birth. Only about 4 percent of males have a completely retractable foreskin at birth, and in more than half of newborn males, the foreskin cannot be retracted far enough to visualize the urethral meatus .
- Baskin LS. Circumcision. In: Handbook of Pediatric Urology, 2nd ed, Baskin LS, Kogan BA (Eds), Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia 2005. p.1.
- Hsieh TF, Chang CH, Chang SS. Foreskin development before adolescence in 2149 schoolboys. Int J Urol 2006; 13:968.
- Yang C, Liu X, Wei GH. Foreskin development in 10 421 Chinese boys aged 0-18 years. World J Pediatr 2009; 5:312.
- Wan S, Wang Y, Gu S. Epidemiology of male genital abnormalities: a population study. Pediatrics 2014; 133:e624.
- McGregor TB, Pike JG, Leonard MP. Pathologic and physiologic phimosis: approach to the phimotic foreskin. Can Fam Physician 2007; 53:445.
- Van Howe RS. Cost-effective treatment of phimosis. Pediatrics 1998; 102:E43.
- Shankar KR, Rickwood AM. The incidence of phimosis in boys. BJU Int 1999; 84:101.
- GAIRDNER D. The fate of the foreskin, a study of circumcision. Br Med J 1949; 2:1433.
- Steadman B, Ellsworth P. To circ or not to circ: indications, risks, and alternatives to circumcision in the pediatric population with phimosis. Urol Nurs 2006; 26:181.
- Metcalfe PD, Elyas R. Foreskin management: Survey of Canadian pediatric urologists. Can Fam Physician 2010; 56:e290.
- Zampieri N, Corroppolo M, Camoglio FS, et al. Phimosis: stretching methods with or without application of topical steroids? J Pediatr 2005; 147:705.
- Orsola A, Caffaratti J, Garat JM. Conservative treatment of phimosis in children using a topical steroid. Urology 2000; 56:307.
- Moreno G, Corbalán J, Peñaloza B, Pantoja T. Topical corticosteroids for treating phimosis in boys. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 9:CD008973.
- Letendre J, Barrieras D, Franc-Guimond J, et al. Topical triamcinolone for persistent phimosis. J Urol 2009; 182:1759.
- Zavras N, Christianakis E, Mpourikas D, Ereikat K. Conservative treatment of phimosis with fluticasone proprionate 0.05%: a clinical study in 1185 boys. J Pediatr Urol 2009; 5:181.
- Palmer LS, Palmer JS. The efficacy of topical betamethasone for treating phimosis: a comparison of two treatment regimens. Urology 2008; 72:68.
- Wiswell TE, Roscelli JD. Corroborative evidence for the decreased incidence of urinary tract infections in circumcised male infants. Pediatrics 1986; 78:96.
- Wiswell TE, Smith FR, Bass JW. Decreased incidence of urinary tract infections in circumcised male infants. Pediatrics 1985; 75:901.
- Wiswell TE, Geschke DW. Risks from circumcision during the first month of life compared with those for uncircumcised boys. Pediatrics 1989; 83:1011.
- Singh-Grewal D, Macdessi J, Craig J. Circumcision for the prevention of urinary tract infection in boys: a systematic review of randomised trials and observational studies. Arch Dis Child 2005; 90:853.
- To T, Agha M, Dick PT, Feldman W. Cohort study on circumcision of newborn boys and subsequent risk of urinary-tract infection. Lancet 1998; 352:1813.
- Schoen EJ, Colby CJ, Ray GT. Newborn circumcision decreases incidence and costs of urinary tract infections during the first year of life. Pediatrics 2000; 105:789.
- Vincent MV, Mackinnon E. The response of clinical balanitis xerotica obliterans to the application of topical steroid-based creams. J Pediatr Surg 2005; 40:709.
- Gargollo PC, Kozakewich HP, Bauer SB, et al. Balanitis xerotica obliterans in boys. J Urol 2005; 174:1409.
- NORMAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE FORESKIN
- FORESKIN RETRACTION
- ROUTINE CARE AND HYGIENE
- ASSOCIATED CONDITIONS
- Benign conditions
- - Physiologic phimosis
- - Smegma and preputial cysts
- - Foreskin ballooning
- Pathologic conditions
- - Pathologic phimosis
- - Paraphimosis
- - Recurrent urinary infection
- - Balanoposthitis
- - Balanitis xerotica obliterans
- INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS
- SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS