Medline ® Abstracts for References 1-5

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to provide evidenced-based guidance for surgical decisions during cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN: We performed MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and COCHRANE searches with the terms cesarean section, cesarean delivery, cesarean, pregnancy, randomized trials, and each technical aspect of cesarean delivery. All randomized trials that covered a surgical aspect of cesarean delivery were included in the review. Each surgical step of cesarean delivery was reviewed separately.

RESULTS: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations favor blunt uterine incision expansion, prophylactic antibiotics (either ampicillin or first-generation cephalosporin for just 1 dose), spontaneous placental removal, non-closure of both visceral and parietal peritoneum, and suture closure or drain of the subcutaneous tissue when thickness is>or =2 cm.

CONCLUSION: Cesarean delivery techniques that are supported by good quality recommendations should be performed routinely. All technical aspects that have recommendations with lower quality should be researched with adequately powered and designed trials.

Cesarean delivery on maternal request is defined as a primary cesarean delivery at maternal request in the absence of any medical or obstetric indication. A potential benefit of cesarean delivery on maternal request is decreased risk of hemorrhage for the mother. Potential risks of cesarean delivery on maternal request include a longer maternal hospital stay, an increased risk of respiratory problems for the baby, and greater complications in subsequent pregnancies, including uterine rupture and placental implantation problems. Cesarean delivery on maternal request should not be performed before gestational age of 39 weeks has been accurately determined unless there is documentation of lung maturity . Cesarean delivery on maternal request is not recommended for women desiring several children, given that the risks of placenta previa, placenta accreta, and the need for gravid hysterectomy increase with each cesarean delivery.

Cesarean deliveries are among the most common surgical procedures performed in the United States. Recent publications demonstrate the reduced risks of these operations and describe their potential benefits to both mothers and children. Recent surveys show that a substantial minority of obstetricians would accede to patients' requests for elective primary cesarean delivery, and some of these professionals would prefer that mode of delivery for themselves or their partners. However, scant attention has been paid to the ethical underpinnings of surgery by choice in these circumstances or ethically justified criteria for determining the role of patient choice in elective surgery generally. We define and elaborate upon the role of beneficence-, autonomy-, and justice-based considerations in these deliberations. We conclude that beneficence-based clinical judgment still favors vaginal delivery. Additionally, we have no confidence that either offering or performing elective cesarean delivery is consistent with substantive-justice-based considerations and conclude that there is no autonomy-based obligation to offer cesarean delivery in an ethically and legally appropriate informed consent process. Physicians should respond to patient-initiated requests for such procedures with a thorough informed consent process and request that the woman reconsider to ensure that her autonomy is being meaningfully exercised. In such cases, implementing a woman's request is ethically permissible.