Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2016 UpToDate®

Basic principles and technique of electrical cardioversion and defibrillation

Bradley P Knight, MD, FACC
Section Editor
Richard L Page, MD
Deputy Editor
Brian C Downey, MD, FACC


Electrical cardioversion and defibrillation have become routine procedures in the management of patients with cardiac arrhythmias. Cardioversion is the delivery of energy that is synchronized to the QRS complex, while defibrillation is the nonsynchronized delivery of a shock randomly during the cardiac cycle. In 1956, alternating current (AC) for transthoracic defibrillation was first used to treat ventricular fibrillation in humans [1]. Following this breakthrough, in 1962 direct current (DC) defibrillators were introduced into clinical practice [2]. Subsequent studies in the early 1960s demonstrated that electrical countershock or cardioversion across the closed chest could abolish other cardiac arrhythmias in addition to ventricular fibrillation [3-5].

This topic will review the basic principles and technique of electrical cardioversion and defibrillation. The clinical indications for these procedures, procedural sedation, potential side effects, and the use of the automated external defibrillator (AED) are discussed separately. (See "Cardioversion for specific arrhythmias" and "Procedural sedation in adults outside the operating room" and "Procedural sedation in children outside of the operating room" and "Automated external defibrillators".)


Most defibrillators are energy-based, meaning that the devices charge a capacitor to a selected voltage and then deliver a prespecified amount of energy in joules. The amount of energy that arrives at the myocardium is dependent upon the selected voltage and the transthoracic impedance (which varies by patient).

Two other types of defibrillators are used less frequently in clinical practice:

Impedance-based defibrillators allow selection of transthoracic current based upon the transthoracic impedance; the latter is assessed initially with a test pulse with the capacitor subsequently charged to the appropriate voltage [6].


Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Sep 2016. | This topic last updated: Sep 8, 2016.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2016 UpToDate, Inc.
  1. ZOLL PM, LINENTHAL AJ, GIBSON W, et al. Termination of ventricular fibrillation in man by externally applied electric countershock. N Engl J Med 1956; 254:727.
  2. LOWN B, AMARASINGHAM R, NEUMAN J. New method for terminating cardiac arrhythmias. Use of synchronized capacitor discharge. JAMA 1962; 182:548.
  3. ALEXANDER S, KLEIGER R, LOWN B. Use of external electric countershock in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia. JAMA 1961; 177:916.
  4. Zoll PM, Linentha AJ. Termination of refractory tachycardia by external countershock. Circulation 1962; 25:596.
  5. PAUL MH, MILLER RA. External electrical termination of supraventricular arrhythmias in congenital heart disease. Circulation 1962; 25:604.
  6. Kerber RE, Martins JB, Kienzle MG, et al. Energy, current, and success in defibrillation and cardioversion: clinical studies using an automated impedance-based method of energy adjustment. Circulation 1988; 77:1038.
  7. Lerman BB, Halperin HR, Tsitlik JE, et al. Relationship between canine transthoracic impedance and defibrillation threshold. Evidence for current-based defibrillation. J Clin Invest 1987; 80:797.
  8. Kerber RE, Jensen SR, Gascho JA, et al. Determinants of defibrillation: prospective analysis of 183 patients. Am J Cardiol 1983; 52:739.
  9. Lerman BB, DiMarco JP, Haines DE. Current-based versus energy-based ventricular defibrillation: a prospective study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 12:1259.
  10. Plonsey R, Barr RC. Effect of microscopic and macroscopic discontinuities on the response of cardiac tissue to defibrillating (stimulating) currents. Med Biol Eng Comput 1986; 24:130.
  11. Mower MM, Mirowski M, Spear JF, Moore EN. Patterns of ventricular activity during catheter defibrillation. Circulation 1974; 49:858.
  12. Witkowski FX, Penkoske PA, Plonsey R. Mechanism of cardiac defibrillation in open-chest dogs with unipolar DC-coupled simultaneous activation and shock potential recordings. Circulation 1990; 82:244.
  13. Chen PS, Shibata N, Dixon EG, et al. Activation during ventricular defibrillation in open-chest dogs. Evidence of complete cessation and regeneration of ventricular fibrillation after unsuccessful shocks. J Clin Invest 1986; 77:810.
  14. Zipes DP, Fischer J, King RM, et al. Termination of ventricular fibrillation in dogs by depolarizing a critical amount of myocardium. Am J Cardiol 1975; 36:37.
  15. Chen PS, Wolf PD, Ideker RE. Mechanism of cardiac defibrillation. A different point of view. Circulation 1991; 84:913.
  16. Witkowski FX, Kerber RE. Currently known mechanisms underlying direct current external and internal cardiac defibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1991; 2:562.
  17. Chen PS, Shibata N, Dixon EG, et al. Comparison of the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of ventricular vulnerability. Circulation 1986; 73:1022.
  18. Chen PS, Wolf PD, Melnick SD, et al. Comparison of activation during ventricular fibrillation and following unsuccessful defibrillation shocks in open-chest dogs. Circ Res 1990; 66:1544.
  19. Huang J, KenKnight BH, Walcott GP, et al. Effects of transvenous electrode polarity and waveform duration on the relationship between defibrillation threshold and upper limit of vulnerability. Circulation 1997; 96:1351.
  20. Sweeney RJ, Gill RM, Steinberg MI, Reid PR. Ventricular refractory period extension caused by defibrillation shocks. Circulation 1990; 82:965.
  21. Zhou XH, Knisley SB, Wolf PD, et al. Prolongation of repolarization time by electric field stimulation with monophasic and biphasic shocks in open-chest dogs. Circ Res 1991; 68:1761.
  22. Moubarak JB, Karasik PE, Fletcher RD, Franz MR. High dispersion of ventricular repolarization after an implantable defibrillator shock predicts induction of ventricular fibrillation as well as unsuccessful defibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35:422.
  23. Goktekin O, Melek M, Gorenek B, et al. Cardiac troponin T and cardiac enzymes after external transthoracic cardioversion of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with coronary artery disease. Chest 2002; 122:2050.
  25. Botto GL, Politi A, Bonini W, et al. External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: role of paddle position on technical efficacy and energy requirements. Heart 1999; 82:726.
  26. Kirchhof P, Eckardt L, Loh P, et al. Anterior-posterior versus anterior-lateral electrode positions for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 360:1275.
  27. Myerburg RJ, Castellanos A. Electrode positioning for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Lancet 2002; 360:1263.
  28. Kerber RE, Jensen SR, Grayzel J, et al. Elective cardioversion: influence of paddle-electrode location and size on success rates and energy requirements. N Engl J Med 1981; 305:658.
  29. Mathew TP, Moore A, McIntyre M, et al. Randomised comparison of electrode positions for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Heart 1999; 81:576.
  30. Walsh SJ, McCarty D, McClelland AJ, et al. Impedance compensated biphasic waveforms for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a multi-centre comparison of antero-apical and antero-posterior pad positions. Eur Heart J 2005; 26:1298.
  31. Thomas ED, Ewy GA, Dahl CF, Ewy MD. Effectiveness of direct current defibrillation: role of paddle electrode size. Am Heart J 1977; 93:463.
  32. Ewy GA, Horan WJ. Effectiveness of direct current defibrillation: role of paddle electrode size: II. Am Heart J 1977; 93:674.
  33. Dalzell GW, Cunningham SR, Anderson J, Adgey AA. Electrode pad size, transthoracic impedance and success of external ventricular defibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1989; 64:741.
  34. Kugelberg J. The interelectrode electrical resistance at defibrillation. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1972; 6:274.
  35. Ewy GA, Taren D. Impedance to transthoracic direct current discharge: a model for testing interface material. Med Instrum 1978; 12:47.
  36. Dahl CF, Ewy GA, Warner ED, Thomas ED. Myocardial necrosis from direct current countershock. Effect of paddle electrode size and time interval between discharges. Circulation 1974; 50:956.
  37. Hoyt R, Grayzel J, Kerber RE. Determinants of intracardiac current in defibrillation. Experimental studies in dogs. Circulation 1981; 64:818.
  38. Kirchhof P, Mönnig G, Wasmer K, et al. A trial of self-adhesive patch electrodes and hand-held paddle electrodes for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (MOBIPAPA). Eur Heart J 2005; 26:1292.
  39. Schuder JC, McDaniel WC, Stoeckle H. Defibrillation of 100 kg calves with asymmetrical, bidirectional, rectangular pulses. Cardiovasc Res 1984; 18:419.
  40. Walcott GP, Melnick SB, Chapman FW, et al. Relative efficacy of monophasic and biphasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation after short and long durations of ventricular fibrillation. Circulation 1998; 98:2210.
  41. Leng CT, Paradis NA, Calkins H, et al. Resuscitation after prolonged ventricular fibrillation with use of monophasic and biphasic waveform pulses for external defibrillation. Circulation 2000; 101:2968.
  42. Jones JL, Jones RE. Improved defibrillator waveform safety factor with biphasic waveforms. Am J Physiol 1983; 245:H60.
  43. Niemann JT, Burian D, Garner D, Lewis RJ. Monophasic versus biphasic transthoracic countershock after prolonged ventricular fibrillation in a swine model. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36:932.
  44. Schneider T, Martens PR, Paschen H, et al. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of 150-J biphasic shocks compared with 200- to 360-J monophasic shocks in the resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims. Optimized Response to Cardiac Arrest (ORCA) Investigators. Circulation 2000; 102:1780.
  45. Mittal S, Ayati S, Stein KM, et al. Comparison of a novel rectilinear biphasic waveform with a damped sine wave monophasic waveform for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation. ZOLL Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34:1595.
  46. Mittal S, Ayati S, Stein KM, et al. Transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: comparison of rectilinear biphasic versus damped sine wave monophasic shocks. Circulation 2000; 101:1282.
  47. Page RL, Kerber RE, Russell JK, et al. Biphasic versus monophasic shock waveform for conversion of atrial fibrillation: the results of an international randomized, double-blind multicenter trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39:1956.
  48. Niebauer MJ, Brewer JE, Chung MK, Tchou PJ. Comparison of the rectilinear biphasic waveform with the monophasic damped sine waveform for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter. Am J Cardiol 2004; 93:1495.
  49. Faddy SC, Jennings PA. Biphasic versus monophasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 2:CD006762.
  50. Morrison LJ, Dorian P, Long J, et al. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest rectilinear biphasic to monophasic damped sine defibrillation waveforms with advanced life support intervention trial (ORBIT). Resuscitation 2005; 66:149.
  51. Kudenchuk PJ, Cobb LA, Copass MK, et al. Transthoracic incremental monophasic versus biphasic defibrillation by emergency responders (TIMBER): a randomized comparison of monophasic with biphasic waveform ascending energy defibrillation for the resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation. Circulation 2006; 114:2010.
  52. Mortensen K, Risius T, Schwemer TF, et al. Biphasic versus monophasic shock for external cardioversion of atrial flutter: a prospective, randomized trial. Cardiology 2008; 111:57.
  53. Niebauer MJ, Chung MK, Brewer JE, Tchou PJ. Reduced cardioversion thresholds for atrial fibrillation and flutter using the rectilinear biphasic waveform. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2005; 13:145.
  54. Stiell IG, Walker RG, Nesbitt LP, et al. BIPHASIC Trial: a randomized comparison of fixed lower versus escalating higher energy levels for defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation 2007; 115:1511.
  55. Deale OC, Lerman BB. Intrathoracic current flow during transthoracic defibrillation in dogs. Transcardiac current fraction. Circ Res 1990; 67:1405.
  56. Dahl CF, Ewy GA, Ewy MD, Thomas ED. Transthoracic impedance to direct current discharge: effect of repeated countershocks. Med Instrum 1976; 10:151.
  57. Geddes LA, Tacker WA, Cabler P, et al. The decrease in transthoracic impedance during successive ventricular defibrillation trials. Med Instrum 1975; 9:179.
  58. Kerber RE, Grayzel J, Hoyt R, et al. Transthoracic resistance in human defibrillation. Influence of body weight, chest size, serial shocks, paddle size and paddle contact pressure. Circulation 1981; 63:676.
  59. Fumagalli S, Tarantini F, Caldi F, et al. Multiple shocks affect thoracic electrical impedance during external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2009; 32:371.
  60. Sirna SJ, Kieso RA, Fox-Eastham KJ, et al. Mechanisms responsible for decline in transthoracic impedance after DC shocks. Am J Physiol 1989; 257:H1180.
  61. Kerber RE, Vance S, Schomer SJ, et al. Transthoracic defibrillation: effect of sternotomy on chest impedance. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20:94.
  62. Ewy GA, Hellman DA, McClung S, Taren D. Influence of ventilation phase on transthoracic impedance and defibrillation effectiveness. Crit Care Med 1980; 8:164.
  63. Ewy GA, Taren D. Comparison of paddle electrode pastes used for defibrillation. Heart Lung 1977; 6:847.
  64. Crampton R. Accepted, controversial, and speculative aspects of ventricular defibrillation. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1980; 23:167.
  65. Gascho JA, Crampton RS, Cherwek ML, et al. Determinants of ventricular defibrillation in adults. Circulation 1979; 60:231.
  66. Link MS, Atkins DL, Passman RS, et al. Part 6: electrical therapies: automated external defibrillators, defibrillation, cardioversion, and pacing: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010; 122:S706.
  67. Winkle RA, Stinson EB, Bach SM Jr, et al. Measurement of cardioversion/defibrillation thresholds in man by a truncated exponential waveform and an apical patch-superior vena caval spring electrode configuration. Circulation 1984; 69:766.
  68. Kienzle MG, Miller J, Falcone RA, et al. Intraoperative endocardial mapping during sinus rhythm: relationship to site of origin of ventricular tachycardia. Circulation 1984; 70:957.
  69. Kerber RE, Kienzle MG, Olshansky B, et al. Ventricular tachycardia rate and morphology determine energy and current requirements for transthoracic cardioversion. Circulation 1992; 85:158.
  70. Windecker S, Ideker RE, Plumb VJ, et al. The influence of ventricular fibrillation duration on defibrillation efficacy using biphasic waveforms in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33:33.
  71. Dalzell GW, Adgey AA. Determinants of successful transthoracic defibrillation and outcome in ventricular fibrillation. Br Heart J 1991; 65:311.
  72. Winkle RA, Mead RH, Ruder MA, et al. Effect of duration of ventricular fibrillation on defibrillation efficacy in humans. Circulation 1990; 81:1477.
  73. Weaver WD, Cobb LA, Copass MK, Hallstrom AP. Ventricular defibrillation -- a comparative trial using 175-J and 320-J shocks. N Engl J Med 1982; 307:1101.
  74. Ricard P, Lévy S, Trigano J, et al. Prospective assessment of the minimum energy needed for external electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79:815.
  75. Lown B. Electrical reversion of cardiac arrhythmias. Br Heart J 1967; 29:469.
  76. Echt DS, Black JN, Barbey JT, et al. Evaluation of antiarrhythmic drugs on defibrillation energy requirements in dogs. Sodium channel block and action potential prolongation. Circulation 1989; 79:1106.
  77. Suddath WO, Deychak Y, Varghese PJ. Electrophysiologic basis by which epinephrine facilitates defibrillation after prolonged episodes of ventricular fibrillation. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 38:201.
  78. Oral H, Souza JJ, Michaud GF, et al. Facilitating transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation with ibutilide pretreatment. N Engl J Med 1999; 340:1849.