Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2017 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Basic approach to delayed intraventricular conduction

Ary L Goldberger, MD
Section Editor
David M Mirvis, MD
Deputy Editor
Gordon M Saperia, MD, FACC


Delayed intraventricular conduction is a common clinical abnormality detected on the electrocardiogram. This topic will review the basic aspects of this problem [1,2]. More complete discussions of left and right bundle branch block are presented elsewhere. (See "Left bundle branch block" and "Right bundle branch block" and "ECG tutorial: Intraventricular block".)

Normal ventricular depolarization occurs after an impulse traverses the atrioventricular (AV) node and the bundle of His. This bundle of specialized conducting tissue splits into two main branches, the right and the left bundles, that rapidly transmit depolarization impulses to the right and left ventricular myocardium, respectively, via the Purkinje fibers. The main left bundle bifurcates into two primary subdivisions: a left anterior fascicle and a left posterior fascicle. Some patients have a third subdivision, a median fascicle. The depolarization wavefronts spread through the ventricular wall, from endocardium (inner layer) to epicardium (outer layer), triggering intracellular calcium release and myofilament contraction (electromechanical coupling).


Right and left bundle branch blocks usually reflect intrinsic impairment of conduction in either the right or left bundle system, respectively (intraventricular conduction disturbances). Bundle branch block can be chronic or intermittent. As an example, transient rate-related bundle branch blocks do not uncommonly occur when the heart rate exceeds some critical value (tachycardia- or acceleration-dependent). Bradycardia or deceleration-dependent bundle branch blocks, in which conduction delay occurs when the rate falls below a certain level, are relatively rare.

Electrocardiographic changes — Bundle branch block leads to prolongation of the QRS interval and sometimes to alterations in the QRS vector. (See "Basic principles of electrocardiographic interpretation".) The degree of prolongation of the QRS interval depends upon the severity of the impairment. With complete bundle branch blocks, the QRS interval is classically stated to be greater than or equal to 120 ms (0.12 sec) in duration (three small boxes on electrocardiogram [ECG] paper); with incomplete blocks, the QRS interval is defined between 100 (or 110 by computer) and 120 ms (0.10 [or 0.11 by computer] to 0.12 sec).

The QRS vector in bundle branch block is generally oriented in the direction of the myocardial region in which depolarization is delayed. The major late QRS vector is normally directed to the left and posteriorly due to depolarization of the left ventricle. However, right bundle branch block (RBBB) delays activation of the right ventricle to the late phase of depolarization (movie 1). As a result, the terminal QRS vector is oriented anteriorly and to the right. This vector points toward the positive axis of the anterior-posterior lead V1 and away from the positive axis of left-right lead V6. Therefore, these changes are represented on the ECG by a late positive wave (rSR) in V1 and a late negative wave (qRS) in V6 (waveform 1 and table 1).

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information on subscription options, click below on the option that best describes you:

Subscribers log in here

Literature review current through: Nov 2017. | This topic last updated: Oct 04, 2017.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2017 UpToDate, Inc.
  1. Goldberger, AL, Goldberger, et al. Goldberger’s Clinical Electrocardiography: A Simplified Approach, 9th, Elsevier, Philadelphia 2013.
  2. Mirvis DM, Goldberger AL. Electrocardiography. In: Braunwald’s Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, 10th ed, Mann DL, Zipes DP, Libby P, Bonow RO (Eds), Elsevier, Philadelphia 2015.
  3. Surawicz B, Childers R, Deal BJ, et al. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part III: intraventricular conduction disturbances: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society: endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. Circulation 2009; 119:e235.