Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2017 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Atrial flutter: Maintenance of sinus rhythm

Jordan M Prutkin, MD, MHS, FHRS
Section Editor
Bradley P Knight, MD, FACC
Deputy Editor
Gordon M Saperia, MD, FACC


Atrial flutter is a relatively common supraventricular arrhythmia that can cause unacceptable symptoms and can promote atrial thrombus formation with the potential for systemic embolization. Restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm improves symptoms and decreases the risk of embolization if atrial flutter recurrence does not occur. (See "Overview of atrial flutter", section on 'Clinical manifestations' and "Embolic risk and the role of anticoagulation in atrial flutter", section on 'Embolic risk'.)

Issues related to the indications and therapeutic options for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in atrial flutter will be reviewed here. Causes of atrial flutter, rate control therapy, the restoration of sinus rhythm after cardioversion, and the role of anticoagulation in atrial flutter are discussed separately. (See "Overview of atrial flutter", section on 'Etiology and risk factors' and "Restoration of sinus rhythm in atrial flutter" and "Embolic risk and the role of anticoagulation in atrial flutter" and "Control of ventricular rate in atrial flutter".)


We attempt to keep most patients with recurrent atrial flutter in sinus rhythm to decrease symptoms, unlike atrial fibrillation (AF) in which rhythm control and rate control are reasonable strategies. In addition, the long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm may decrease the risk of stroke. Rhythm control with either radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation or antiarrhythmic drug therapy is necessary; in most cases, RF catheter ablation is preferred. Exceptions include individuals identified as having reversible triggers such as pneumonia, hyperthyroidism, and other acute medical problems. (See "Rhythm control versus rate control in atrial fibrillation", section on 'Choice of therapy'.).

Atrial flutter is characterized by rapid, regular atrial depolarizations at a characteristic rate of approximately 300 beats/min. In the absence of rate slowing drugs or atrioventricular (AV) nodal disease, every other depolarization passes through the AV node, and the ventricular rate is usually around 150 beats per minute. Unlike AF, attempts to slow this rate are often unsuccessful or require high doses of rate slowing drugs; thus, the maintenance of sinus rhythm is desirable in most patients to control symptoms. In addition, episodes will often be recurrent unless a reversible cause is present. (See "ECG tutorial: Atrial and atrioventricular nodal (supraventricular) arrhythmias", section on 'Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter' and "Overview of atrial flutter".)

The discussion in this topic pertains primarily to patients with typical atrial flutter. The pathogenesis of typical atrial flutter makes it highly amendable to curative therapy with radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation, though atypical flutters may also be cured with RF ablation. Typical (also called isthmus-dependent) atrial flutter utilizes a large macroreentrant pathway in the right atrium, with the left atrium following passively. (See "Electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic features of atrial flutter".)

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information on subscription options, click below on the option that best describes you:

Subscribers log in here

Literature review current through: Sep 2017. | This topic last updated: Mar 22, 2016.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2017 UpToDate, Inc.
  1. Wells JL Jr, MacLean WA, James TN, Waldo AL. Characterization of atrial flutter. Studies in man after open heart surgery using fixed atrial electrodes. Circulation 1979; 60:665.
  2. Klein GJ, Guiraudon GM, Sharma AD, Milstein S. Demonstration of macroreentry and feasibility of operative therapy in the common type of atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol 1986; 57:587.
  3. Cosio FG, Arribas F, Barbero JM, et al. Validation of double-spike electrograms as markers of conduction delay or block in atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol 1988; 61:775.
  4. Cosio FG, López-Gil M, Goicolea A, Arribas F. Electrophysiologic studies in atrial flutter. Clin Cardiol 1992; 15:667.
  5. Olshansky B, Okumura K, Hess PG, Waldo AL. Demonstration of an area of slow conduction in human atrial flutter. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 16:1639.
  6. Dixit S, Lavi N, Robinson M, et al. Noncontact electroanatomic mapping to characterize typical atrial flutter: participation of right atrial posterior wall in the reentrant circuit. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2011; 22:422.
  7. Touboul P, Saoudi N, Atallah G, Kirkorian G. Electrophysiologic basis of catheter ablation in atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol 1989; 64:79J.
  8. Feld GK, Fleck RP, Chen PS, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation for the treatment of human type 1 atrial flutter. Identification of a critical zone in the reentrant circuit by endocardial mapping techniques. Circulation 1992; 86:1233.
  9. Kirkorian G, Moncada E, Chevalier P, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter. Efficacy of an anatomically guided approach. Circulation 1994; 90:2804.
  10. Olgin JE, Kalman JM, Fitzpatrick AP, Lesh MD. Role of right atrial endocardial structures as barriers to conduction during human type I atrial flutter. Activation and entrainment mapping guided by intracardiac echocardiography. Circulation 1995; 92:1839.
  11. Poty H, Saoudi N, Abdel Aziz A, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of type 1 atrial flutter. Prediction of late success by electrophysiological criteria. Circulation 1995; 92:1389.
  12. Cauchemez B, Haissaguerre M, Fischer B, et al. Electrophysiological effects of catheter ablation of inferior vena cava-tricuspid annulus isthmus in common atrial flutter. Circulation 1996; 93:284.
  13. Nath S, Mounsey JP, Haines DE, DiMarco JP. Predictors of acute and long-term success after radiofrequency catheter ablation of type 1 atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76:604.
  14. Steinberg JS, Prasher S, Zelenkofske S, Ehlert FA. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial flutter: procedural success and long-term outcome. Am Heart J 1995; 130:85.
  15. Fischer B, Haissaguerre M, Garrigues S, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of common atrial flutter in 80 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25:1365.
  16. Poty H, Saoudi N, Nair M, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial flutter. Further insights into the various types of isthmus block: application to ablation during sinus rhythm. Circulation 1996; 94:3204.
  17. Schwartzman D, Callans DJ, Gottlieb CD, et al. Conduction block in the inferior vena caval-tricuspid valve isthmus: association with outcome of radiofrequency ablation of type I atrial flutter. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28:1519.
  18. Nabar A, Rodriguez LM, Timmermans C, et al. Isoproterenol to evaluate resumption of conduction after right atrial isthmus ablation in type I atrial flutter. Circulation 1999; 99:3286.
  19. Lehrmann H, Weber R, Park CI, et al. "Dormant transisthmus conduction" revealed by adenosine after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation. Heart Rhythm 2012; 9:1942.
  20. Jacobsen PK, Klein GJ, Gula LJ, et al. Voltage-guided ablation technique for cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter: refining the continuous line. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2012; 23:672.
  21. Kottkamp H, Hügl B, Krauss B, et al. Electromagnetic versus fluoroscopic mapping of the inferior isthmus for ablation of typical atrial flutter: A prospective randomized study. Circulation 2000; 102:2082.
  22. Scheinman MM, Huang S. The 1998 NASPE prospective catheter ablation registry. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000; 23:1020.
  23. Calkins H, Canby R, Weiss R, et al. Results of catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol 2004; 94:437.
  24. Spector P, Reynolds MR, Calkins H, et al. Meta-analysis of ablation of atrial flutter and supraventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol 2009; 104:671.
  25. Anselme F, Saoudi N, Poty H, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of common atrial flutter: significance of palpitations and quality-of-life evaluation in patients with proven isthmus block. Circulation 1999; 99:534.
  26. Ng DW, Altemose GT, Wu Q, et al. Typical atrial flutter as a risk factor for the development of atrial fibrillation in patients without otherwise demonstrable atrial tachyarrhythmias. Mayo Clin Proc 2008; 83:646.
  27. Paydak H, Kall JG, Burke MC, et al. Atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency ablation of type I atrial flutter: time to onset, determinants, and clinical course. Circulation 1998; 98:315.
  28. Ellis K, Wazni O, Marrouche N, et al. Incidence of atrial fibrillation post-cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in patients with typical atrial flutter: left-atrial size as an independent predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2007; 18:799.
  29. Luchsinger JA, Steinberg JS. Resolution of cardiomyopathy after ablation of atrial flutter. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32:205.
  30. Lee SH, Tai CT, Yu WC, et al. Effects of radiofrequency catheter ablation on quality of life in patients with atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol 1999; 84:278.
  31. O'Callaghan PA, Meara M, Kongsgaard E, et al. Symptomatic improvement after radiofrequency catheter ablation for typical atrial flutter. Heart 2001; 86:167.
  32. Bohnen M, Stevenson WG, Tedrow UB, et al. Incidence and predictors of major complications from contemporary catheter ablation to treat cardiac arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm 2011; 8:1661.
  33. Pérez FJ, Schubert CM, Parvez B, et al. Long-term outcomes after catheter ablation of cavo-tricuspid isthmus dependent atrial flutter: a meta-analysis. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2009; 2:393.
  34. Natale A, Newby KH, Pisanó E, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of antiarrhythmic therapy versus first-line radiofrequency ablation in patients with atrial flutter. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35:1898.
  35. Hohnloser SH, Zabel M. Short- and long-term efficacy and safety of flecainide acetate for supraventricular arrhythmias. Am J Cardiol 1992; 70:3A.
  36. Singh S, Zoble RG, Yellen L, et al. Efficacy and safety of oral dofetilide in converting to and maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter: the symptomatic atrial fibrillation investigative research on dofetilide (SAFIRE-D) study. Circulation 2000; 102:2385.
  37. Page RL, Connolly SJ, Crijns HJ, et al. Rhythm- and rate-controlling effects of dronedarone in patients with atrial fibrillation (from the ATHENA trial). Am J Cardiol 2011; 107:1019.
  38. Mohanty S, Mohanty P, Di Biase L, et al. Results from a single-blind, randomized study comparing the impact of different ablation approaches on long-term procedure outcome in coexistent atrial fibrillation and flutter (APPROVAL). Circulation 2013; 127:1853.
  39. Wazni O, Marrouche NF, Martin DO, et al. Randomized study comparing combined pulmonary vein-left atrial junction disconnection and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation versus pulmonary vein-left atrial junction disconnection alone in patients presenting with typical atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2003; 108:2479.
  40. Waldo AL, Cooper TB. Spontaneous onset of type I atrial flutter in patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28:707.
  41. Waldo AL. Mechanisms of atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation: distinct entities or two sides of a coin? Cardiovasc Res 2002; 54:217.