Smarter Decisions,
Better Care

UpToDate synthesizes the most recent medical information into evidence-based practical recommendations clinicians trust to make the right point-of-care decisions.

  • Rigorous editorial process: Evidence-based treatment recommendations
  • World-Renowned physician authors: over 5,100 physician authors and editors around the globe
  • Innovative technology: integrates into the workflow; access from EMRs

Choose from the list below to learn more about subscriptions for a:


Subscribers log in here


Aortic intramural hematoma

INTRODUCTION

Two different anatomic systems, the DeBakey and Stanford (Daily) systems, have been used to classify aortic dissection [1,2]. The Stanford system, which is more widely used, classifies dissections that involve the ascending aorta as type A, regardless of the site of the primary intimal tear, and all other dissections as type B. In contrast, the DeBakey system is based upon the site of origin with type 1 originating in the ascending aorta and propagating to at least the aortic arch, type 2 originating in and confined to the ascending aorta, and type 3 originating in the descending aorta and extending distally or proximally.

Aortic intramural hematoma (IMH) is one of the variants of aortic dissection and is classified the same way as classic aortic dissection. It is characterized by the absence of a detectable intimal tear (although microtears may be present) and therefore the absence of continuous flow communication (figure 1).

The false channel usually originates from rupture of the vaso vasorum into the media of the aortic wall (picture 1) [3]. Two mechanisms have been described: spontaneous rupture or rupture induced by a penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer [3]. As described below, the presence of a penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer on noninvasive imaging appears to have prognostic importance, being associated with a higher likelihood of progressive disease with medical therapy [4]. (See 'Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer' below.)

Aortic IMH is considered a precursor to classic aortic dissection [3]. In different series, aortic IMH accounted for 5 to 20 percent of patients with symptoms consistent with an aortic dissection (eg, acute aortic syndrome) [5-9].

The clinical features, management, and prognosis of IMH will be reviewed here. Similar issues for typical aortic dissections are discussed separately. (See "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of aortic dissection" and "Management of aortic dissection".)

        

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Sep 2014. | This topic last updated: Nov 20, 2013.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2014 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. DEBAKEY ME, HENLY WS, COOLEY DA, et al. SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF DISSECTING ANEURYSMS OF THE AORTA. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1965; 49:130.
  2. Daily PO, Trueblood HW, Stinson EB, et al. Management of acute aortic dissections. Ann Thorac Surg 1970; 10:237.
  3. Tsai TT, Nienaber CA, Eagle KA. Acute aortic syndromes. Circulation 2005; 112:3802.
  4. Ganaha F, Miller DC, Sugimoto K, et al. Prognosis of aortic intramural hematoma with and without penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer: a clinical and radiological analysis. Circulation 2002; 106:342.
  5. Mohr-Kahaly S, Erbel R, Kearney P, et al. Aortic intramural hemorrhage visualized by transesophageal echocardiography: findings and prognostic implications. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23:658.
  6. Nienaber CA, von Kodolitsch Y, Petersen B, et al. Intramural hemorrhage of the thoracic aorta. Diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Circulation 1995; 92:1465.
  7. Vilacosta I, San Román JA, Ferreirós J, et al. Natural history and serial morphology of aortic intramural hematoma: a novel variant of aortic dissection. Am Heart J 1997; 134:495.
  8. Maraj R, Rerkpattanapipat P, Jacobs LE, et al. Meta-analysis of 143 reported cases of aortic intramural hematoma. Am J Cardiol 2000; 86:664.
  9. Song JK, Kim HS, Kang DH, et al. Different clinical features of aortic intramural hematoma versus dissection involving the ascending aorta. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37:1604.
  10. Evangelista A, Mukherjee D, Mehta RH, et al. Acute intramural hematoma of the aorta: a mystery in evolution. Circulation 2005; 111:1063.
  11. Moizumi Y, Komatsu T, Motoyoshi N, Tabayashi K. Clinical features and long-term outcome of type A and type B intramural hematoma of the aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127:421.
  12. Song JK, Kim HS, Song JM, et al. Outcomes of medically treated patients with aortic intramural hematoma. Am J Med 2002; 113:181.
  13. Spittell PC, Spittell JA Jr, Joyce JW, et al. Clinical features and differential diagnosis of aortic dissection: experience with 236 cases (1980 through 1990). Mayo Clin Proc 1993; 68:642.
  14. von Kodolitsch Y, Csösz SK, Koschyk DH, et al. Intramural hematoma of the aorta: predictors of progression to dissection and rupture. Circulation 2003; 107:1158.
  15. Kang DH, Song JK, Song MG, et al. Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of aortic intramural hemorrhage compared with acute aortic dissection. Am J Cardiol 1998; 81:202.
  16. Keren A, Kim CB, Hu BS, et al. Accuracy of biplane and multiplane transesophageal echocardiography in diagnosis of typical acute aortic dissection and intramural hematoma. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28:627.
  17. von Kodolitsch Y, Nienaber CA, Dieckmann C, et al. Chest radiography for the diagnosis of acute aortic syndrome. Am J Med 2004; 116:73.
  18. Nienaber CA, Eagle KA. Aortic dissection: new frontiers in diagnosis and management: Part I: from etiology to diagnostic strategies. Circulation 2003; 108:628.
  19. Kaji S, Nishigami K, Akasaka T, et al. Prediction of progression or regression of type A aortic intramural hematoma by computed tomography. Circulation 1999; 100:II281.
  20. Sawhney NS, DeMaria AN, Blanchard DG. Aortic intramural hematoma: an increasingly recognized and potentially fatal entity. Chest 2001; 120:1340.
  21. Isselbacher EM. Intramural hematoma of the aorta: should we let down our guard? Am J Med 2002; 113:244.
  22. Kaji S, Akasaka T, Katayama M, et al. Long-term prognosis of patients with type B aortic intramural hematoma. Circulation 2003; 108 Suppl 1:II307.
  23. Song JK, Kang DH, Lim TH, et al. Different remodeling of descending thoracic aorta after acute event in aortic intramural hemorrhage versus aortic dissection. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83:937.
  24. Sueyoshi E, Sakamoto I, Fukuda M, et al. Long-term outcome of type B aortic intramural hematoma: comparison with classic aortic dissection treated by the same therapeutic strategy. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 78:2112.
  25. Sueyoshi E, Imada T, Sakamoto I, et al. Analysis of predictive factors for progression of type B aortic intramural hematoma with computed tomography. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35:1179.
  26. Bosma, MS, Quint, LE, Williams, DM, et al. Ulcerlike projections developing in noncommunicating aortic dissections: CT findings and natrual history. AJR 2009; 193: 895.
  27. Demers P, Miller DC, Mitchell RS, et al. Stent-graft repair of penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers in the descending thoracic aorta: mid-term results. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77:81.