Smarter Decisions,
Better Care
UpToDate synthesizes the most recent medical information into evidence-based practical recommendations clinicians trust to make the right point of care decisions.
For more information, click below.
Subscribers log in here
Related articles
Related Searches
| AuthorDaniel J Sexton, MD | Section EditorCatherine M Otto, MD | Deputy EditorsElinor L Baron, MD, DTMHSusan B Yeon, MD, JD, FACC |
Topic Outline
INTRODUCTION
Antimicrobial prophylaxis for bacterial endocarditis has become standard in most developed countries, despite the fact that no prospective randomized trial has proven that such therapy is beneficial. Furthermore, given the extremely low incidence of endocarditis following procedures such as dental surgery and the medicolegal climate in the United States and Europe, it is unlikely that such a study will ever be undertaken. It has been estimated that a randomized trial to assess the effectiveness of prophylaxis after dental procedures would require at least 6000 patients in each study group [1].
The theoretical basis for antimicrobial prophylaxis for endocarditis and the most recent guideline that was published by the American Heart Association (AHA) in 2007 on the prevention of infective endocarditis will be reviewed here [2]. As will be seen, this guideline made important revisions to previous guidelines. (See 'AHA guideline' below.)
THEORETICAL BASIS FOR PROPHYLAXIS
The pathogenesis of infective endocarditis (IE) is presumed to involve the following sequence of events [3]:
Since the occurrence of bacteremia is crucial to the initiation of an episode of IE, it is theoretically reasonable to conclude that preventing or promptly treating transient bacteremia will prevent the above sequence even if a predisposing valvular lesion is present.
Subscribers log in here