Smarter Decisions,
Better Care

UpToDate synthesizes the most recent medical information into evidence-based practical recommendations clinicians trust to make the right point-of-care decisions.

  • Rigorous editorial process: Evidence-based treatment recommendations
  • World-Renowned physician authors: over 5,100 physician authors and editors around the globe
  • Innovative technology: integrates into the workflow; access from EMRs

Choose from the list below to learn more about subscriptions for a:

Subscribers log in here

Related articles

Acute appendicitis in adults: Clinical manifestations and diagnosis

Topic Outline



Appendicitis, an inflammation of the vestigial vermiform appendix, is one of the most common causes of the acute abdomen and one of the most frequent indications for an emergent abdominal surgical procedure worldwide [1,2].

The clinical manifestations and diagnosis of appendicitis in adults will be reviewed here. The management of appendicitis in adults and appendicitis in pregnancy and children are discussed separately. (See "Acute appendicitis in adults: Management" and "Acute appendicitis in pregnancy" and "Acute appendicitis in children: Clinical manifestations and diagnosis".)


The vermiform appendix is located at the base of the cecum, near the ileocecal valve where the taenia coli converge on the cecum (figure 1) [3,4]. The appendix is a true diverticulum of the cecum. In contrast to acquired diverticular disease, which consists of a protuberance of a subset of the enteric wall layers, the appendiceal wall contains all of the layers of the colonic wall: mucosa, submucosa, muscularis (longitudinal and circular), and the serosal covering [5].

The appendiceal orifice opens into the cecum. Its blood supply, the appendiceal artery, is a terminal branch of the ileocolic artery, which traverses the length of the mesoappendix and terminates at the tip of the organ (figure 2) [4].

The attachment of the appendix to the base of the cecum is constant. However, the tip may migrate to the retrocecal, subcecal, preileal, postileal, and pelvic positions. These normal anatomic variations can complicate the diagnosis as the site of pain and findings on the clinical examination will reflect the anatomic position of the appendix.


Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Jun 2014. | This topic last updated: Nov 6, 2013.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2014 UpToDate, Inc.
  1. Williams GR. Presidential Address: a history of appendicitis. With anecdotes illustrating its importance. Ann Surg 1983; 197:495.
  2. Fitz, RH. Perforating inflammation of the vermiform appendix with special reference to its early diagnosis and treatment. Am J Med Sci 1886; 92:321.
  3. Jaffe, BM, Berger, DH. The Appendix. In: Schwartz Principles of Surgery, 8th ed, Schwartz, SI, Brunicardi, CF (Ed), McGraw-Hill Health Pub. Division, New York 2005.
  4. Buschard K, Kjaeldgaard A. Investigation and analysis of the position, fixation, length and embryology of the vermiform appendix. Acta Chir Scand 1973; 139:293.
  5. Mulholland, MW, Lillemoe, KD, Doherty, GM, et al. Greenfield's Surgery, 4th ed, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA 2005.
  6. Kumar, V, Abbas, AK, Fausto, N. Robbins and Cotran: Pathologic Basis of Disease, 7th ed, Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA 2007.
  7. Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 1990; 132:910.
  8. Birnbaum BA, Wilson SR. Appendicitis at the millennium. Radiology 2000; 215:337.
  9. Burkitt DP. The aetiology of appendicitis. Br J Surg 1971; 58:695.
  10. Butler C. Surgical pathology of acute appendicitis. Hum Pathol 1981; 12:870.
  11. Miranda R, Johnston AD, O'Leary JP. Incidental appendectomy: frequency of pathologic abnormalities. Am Surg 1980; 46:355.
  12. Arnbjörnsson E, Bengmark S. Obstruction of the appendix lumen in relation to pathogenesis of acute appendicitis. Acta Chir Scand 1983; 149:789.
  13. Nitecki S, Karmeli R, Sarr MG. Appendiceal calculi and fecaliths as indications for appendectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990; 171:185.
  14. Jones BA, Demetriades D, Segal I, Burkitt DP. The prevalence of appendiceal fecaliths in patients with and without appendicitis. A comparative study from Canada and South Africa. Ann Surg 1985; 202:80.
  15. Lau WY, Teoh-Chan CH, Fan ST, et al. The bacteriology and septic complication of patients with appendicitis. Ann Surg 1984; 200:576.
  16. Bennion RS, Baron EJ, Thompson JE Jr, et al. The bacteriology of gangrenous and perforated appendicitis--revisited. Ann Surg 1990; 211:165.
  17. Temple CL, Huchcroft SA, Temple WJ. The natural history of appendicitis in adults. A prospective study. Ann Surg 1995; 221:278.
  18. Lee SL, Walsh AJ, Ho HS. Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. Arch Surg 2001; 136:556.
  19. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, et al. Helical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination. Radiology 1997; 202:139.
  20. Chung CH, Ng CP, Lai KK. Delays by patients, emergency physicians, and surgeons in the management of acute appendicitis: retrospective study. Hong Kong Med J 2000; 6:254.
  21. Guidry SP, Poole GV. The anatomy of appendicitis. Am Surg 1994; 60:68.
  22. McBurney, C. Experience with early operative interference in cases of disease of the vermiform appendix. NY Med J 1889; 50:676.
  23. Golledge J, Toms AP, Franklin IJ, et al. Assessment of peritonism in appendicitis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1996; 78:11.
  24. Andersson RE, Hugander AP, Ghazi SH, et al. Diagnostic value of disease history, clinical presentation, and inflammatory parameters of appendicitis. World J Surg 1999; 23:133.
  25. Lane R, Grabham J. A useful sign for the diagnosis of peritoneal irritation in the right iliac fossa. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1997; 79:128.
  26. Rovsing, NT. Indirektes Hervorrufen des typischen Schmerzes an McBurney's Punkt. Ein Beitrag zur diagnostik der Appendicitis und Typhlitis. Zentralblatt für Chirurgie, Leipzig, 1907; 34:1257.
  27. Izbicki JR, Knoefel WT, Wilker DK, et al. Accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a retrospective and prospective analysis of 686 patients. Eur J Surg 1992; 158:227.
  28. Alshehri MY, Ibrahim A, Abuaisha N, et al. Value of rebound tenderness in acute appendicitis. East Afr Med J 1995; 72:504.
  29. Jahn H, Mathiesen FK, Neckelmann K, et al. Comparison of clinical judgment and diagnostic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: experience with a score-aided diagnosis. Eur J Surg 1997; 163:433.
  30. Berry J Jr, Malt RA. Appendicitis near its centenary. Ann Surg 1984; 200:567.
  31. John H, Neff U, Kelemen M. Appendicitis diagnosis today: clinical and ultrasonic deductions. World J Surg 1993; 17:243.
  32. Silen, W. Cope's Early Diagnosis of the Acute Abdomen, 19th edition, Oxford University Press 1996. p.70.
  33. Coleman C, Thompson JE Jr, Bennion RS, Schmit PJ. White blood cell count is a poor predictor of severity of disease in the diagnosis of appendicitis. Am Surg 1998; 64:983.
  34. Tehrani HY, Petros JG, Kumar RR, Chu Q. Markers of severe appendicitis. Am Surg 1999; 65:453.
  35. Thompson MM, Underwood MJ, Dookeran KA, et al. Role of sequential leucocyte counts and C-reactive protein measurements in acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 1992; 79:822.
  36. Grönroos JM, Grönroos P. Leucocyte count and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 1999; 86:501.
  37. Br J Surg 1999; 86:501.
  38. Guraya SY, Al-Tuwaijri TA, Khairy GA, Murshid KR. Validity of leukocyte count to predict the severity of acute appendicitis. Saudi Med J 2005; 26:1945.
  39. Sand M, Bechara FG, Holland-Letz T, et al. Diagnostic value of hyperbilirubinemia as a predictive factor for appendiceal perforation in acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 2009; 198:193.
  40. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA. Sensitivity and specificity of the individual CT signs of appendicitis: experience with 200 helical appendiceal CT examinations. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997; 21:686.
  41. Whitley S, Sookur P, McLean A, Power N. The appendix on CT. Clin Radiol 2009; 64:190.
  42. Choi D, Park H, Lee YR, et al. The most useful findings for diagnosing acute appendicitis on contrast-enhanced helical CT. Acta Radiol 2003; 44:574.
  43. Kessler N, Cyteval C, Gallix B, et al. Appendicitis: evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of US, Doppler US, and laboratory findings. Radiology 2004; 230:472.
  44. Jeffrey RB Jr, Laing FC, Townsend RR. Acute appendicitis: sonographic criteria based on 250 cases. Radiology 1988; 167:327.
  45. Spalluto LB, Woodfield CA, DeBenedectis CM, Lazarus E. MR imaging evaluation of abdominal pain during pregnancy: appendicitis and other nonobstetric causes. Radiographics 2012; 32:317.
  46. Oto A, Ernst RD, Ghulmiyyah LM, et al. MR imaging in the triage of pregnant patients with acute abdominal and pelvic pain. Abdom Imaging 2009; 34:243.
  47. Pedrosa I, Levine D, Eyvazzadeh AD, et al. MR imaging evaluation of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Radiology 2006; 238:891.
  48. Andersson RE. Meta-analysis of the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of appendicitis. Br J Surg 2004; 91:28.
  49. Hong JJ, Cohn SM, Ekeh AP, et al. A prospective randomized study of clinical assessment versus computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2003; 4:231.
  50. Park JS, Jeong JH, Lee JI, et al. Accuracies of diagnostic methods for acute appendicitis. Am Surg 2013; 79:101.
  51. Kosloske AM, Love CL, Rohrer JE, et al. The diagnosis of appendicitis in children: outcomes of a strategy based on pediatric surgical evaluation. Pediatrics 2004; 113:29.
  52. Morris KT, Kavanagh M, Hansen P, et al. The rational use of computed tomography scans in the diagnosis of appendicitis. Am J Surg 2002; 183:547.
  53. Liu CC, Lu CL, Yen DH, et al. Diagnosis of appendicitis in the ED: comparison of surgical and nonsurgical residents. Am J Emerg Med 2001; 19:109.
  54. Denizbasi A, Unluer EE. The role of the emergency medicine resident using the Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with the general surgery resident. Eur J Emerg Med 2003; 10:296.
  55. Kharbanda AB, Fishman SJ, Bachur RG. Comparison of pediatric emergency physicians' and surgeons' evaluation and diagnosis of appendicitis. Acad Emerg Med 2008; 15:119.
  56. Yen K, Karpas A, Pinkerton HJ, Gorelick MH. Interexaminer reliability in physical examination of pediatric patients with abdominal pain. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005; 159:373.
  57. Daehlin L. Acute appendicitis during the first three years of life. Acta Chir Scand 1982; 148:291.
  58. Horattas MC, Guyton DP, Wu D. A reappraisal of appendicitis in the elderly. Am J Surg 1990; 160:291.
  59. Pittman-Waller VA, Myers JG, Stewart RM, et al. Appendicitis: why so complicated? Analysis of 5755 consecutive appendectomies. Am Surg 2000; 66:548.
  60. Hale DA, Molloy M, Pearl RH, et al. Appendectomy: a contemporary appraisal. Ann Surg 1997; 225:252.
  61. Ceydeli A, Lavotshkin S, Yu J, Wise L. When should we order a CT scan and when should we rely on the results to diagnose an acute appendicitis? Curr Surg 2006; 63:464.
  62. Townsend, CM, Beauchamp, RD, Evers, BM, Mattox, KL. Sabiston Textbook of Surgery, 18th ed, Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA 2007.
  63. Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 1986; 15:557.
  64. Kalan M, Talbot D, Cunliffe WJ, Rich AJ. Evaluation of the modified Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a prospective study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1994; 76:418.
  65. Meltzer AC, Baumann BM, Chen EH, et al. Poor sensitivity of a modified Alvarado score in adults with suspected appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 2013; 62:126.
  66. Ohle R, O'Reilly F, O'Brien KK, et al. The Alvarado score for predicting acute appendicitis: a systematic review. BMC Med 2011; 9:139.
  67. McKay R, Shepherd J. The use of the clinical scoring system by Alvarado in the decision to perform computed tomography for acute appendicitis in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2007; 25:489.
  68. Horzić M, Salamon A, Kopljar M, et al. Analysis of scores in diagnosis of acute appendicitis in women. Coll Antropol 2005; 29:133.
  69. Ohmann C, Franke C, Yang Q. Clinical benefit of a diagnostic score for appendicitis: results of a prospective interventional study. German Study Group of Acute Abdominal Pain. Arch Surg 1999; 134:993.
  70. Enochsson L, Gudbjartsson T, Hellberg A, et al. The Fenyö-Lindberg scoring system for appendicitis increases positive predictive value in fertile women--a prospective study in 455 patients randomized to either laparoscopic or open appendectomy. Surg Endosc 2004; 18:1509.
  71. Liu JL, Wyatt JC, Deeks JJ, et al. Systematic reviews of clinical decision tools for acute abdominal pain. Health Technol Assess 2006; 10:1.
  72. SCOAP Collaborative, Cuschieri J, Florence M, et al. Negative appendectomy and imaging accuracy in the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. Ann Surg 2008; 248:557.
  73. Wagner PL, Eachempati SR, Soe K, et al. Defining the current negative appendectomy rate: for whom is preoperative computed tomography making an impact? Surgery 2008; 144:276.
  74. Schuler JG, Shortsleeve MJ, Goldenson RS, et al. Is there a role for abdominal computed tomographic scans in appendicitis? Arch Surg 1998; 133:373.
  75. Flum DR, Morris A, Koepsell T, Dellinger EP. Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis. JAMA 2001; 286:1748.
  76. Flum DR, McClure TD, Morris A, Koepsell T. Misdiagnosis of appendicitis and the use of diagnostic imaging. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 201:933.
  77. Jones K, Peña AA, Dunn EL, et al. Are negative appendectomies still acceptable? Am J Surg 2004; 188:748.
  78. Wilson EB. Surgical evaluation of appendicitis in the new era of radiographic imaging. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2003; 24:65.
  79. Perez J, Barone JE, Wilbanks TO, et al. Liberal use of computed tomography scanning does not improve diagnostic accuracy in appendicitis. Am J Surg 2003; 185:194.
  80. Gaitini D, Beck-Razi N, Mor-Yosef D, et al. Diagnosing acute appendicitis in adults: accuracy of color Doppler sonography and MDCT compared with surgery and clinical follow-up. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190:1300.
  81. Terasawa T, Blackmore CC, Bent S, Kohlwes RJ. Systematic review: computed tomography and ultrasonography to detect acute appendicitis in adults and adolescents. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141:537.
  82. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, et al. Helical CT combined with contrast material administered only through the colon for imaging of suspected appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:1275.
  83. Ege G, Akman H, Sahin A, et al. Diagnostic value of unenhanced helical CT in adult patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Br J Radiol 2002; 75:721.
  84. Lane MJ, Katz DS, Ross BA, et al. Unenhanced helical CT for suspected acute appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168:405.
  85. Lee SL, Ho HS. Ultrasonography and computed tomography in suspected acute appendicitis. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2003; 24:69.
  86. Romero J, Sanabria A, Angarita M, Varón JC. Cost-effectiveness of computed tomography and ultrasound in the diagnosis of appendicitis. Biomedica 2008; 28:139.
  87. Morse BC, Roettger RH, Kalbaugh CA, et al. Abdominal CT scanning in reproductive-age women with right lower quadrant abdominal pain: does its use reduce negative appendectomy rates and healthcare costs? Am Surg 2007; 73:580.
  88. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, et al. Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N Engl J Med 1998; 338:141.
  89. Johansson EP, Rydh A, Riklund KA. Ultrasound, computed tomography, and laboratory findings in the diagnosis of appendicitis. Acta Radiol 2007; 48:267.
  90. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Rattner DW, et al. Introduction of appendiceal CT: impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates. Ann Surg 1999; 229:344.
  91. DeArmond GM, Dent DL, Myers JG, et al. Appendicitis: selective use of abdominal CT reduces negative appendectomy rate. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2003; 4:213.
  92. Lin KH, Leung WS, Wang CP, Chen WK. Cost analysis of management in acute appendicitis with CT scanning under a hospital global budgeting scheme. Emerg Med J 2008; 25:149.
  93. Colson M, Skinner KA, Dunnington G. High negative appendectomy rates are no longer acceptable. Am J Surg 1997; 174:723.
  94. White JJ, Santillana M, Haller JA Jr. Intensive in-hospital observation: a safe way to decrease unnecessary appendectomy. Am Surg 1975; 41:793.
  95. Lee TH, Kim JO, Kim JJ, et al. A case of intussuscepted Meckel's diverticulum. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15:5109.
  96. Banli O, Karakoyun R, Altun H. Ileo-ileal intussusception due to inverted Meckel's diverticulum. Acta Chir Belg 2009; 109:516.